Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28419114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

H-FABP: A new biomarker to differentiate between CT-positive and CT-negative patients with mild traumatic brain injury.

Linnéa Lagerstedt, Juan José Egea-Guerrero, Alejandro Bustamante, Joan Montaner, Ana Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Amir El Rahal, Natacha Turck, Manuel Quintana, Roser García-Armengol, Carmen Melinda Prica and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Biomarkers in traumatic brain injury: new concepts.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Linnéa LagerstedtDepartment of Human Protein Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Juan José Egea-GuerreroNeuroCritical Care Unit, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Alejandro BustamanteNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan MontanerNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Rodríguez-RodríguezNeuroCritical Care Unit, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Amir El RahalDivision of Neurosurgery, Geneva Neuroscience Center, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Natacha TurckDepartment of Human Protein Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Manuel QuintanaIntensive Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, idiPAZ, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Roser García-ArmengolNeurosurgical department, Neuroscience Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Carmen Melinda PricaEmergency Department, Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta, Tortosa, Spain.
Elisabeth AndereggenEmergency Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lara RinaldiEmergency Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Asita SarrafzadehDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karl SchallerDivision of Neurosurgery, Geneva Neuroscience Center, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jean-Charles SanchezDepartment of Human Protein Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESHospital de Tortosa Virgen de la Cinta · ESHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) will have normal Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 15. Furthermore, only 5%-8% of them will be CT-positive for an mTBI. Having a useful biomarker would help clinicians evaluate a patient's risk of developing intracranial lesions. The S100B protein is currently the most studied and promising biomarker for this purpose. Heart fatty-acid binding protein (H-FABP) has been highlighted in brain injury models and investigated as a biomarker for stroke and severe TBI, for example. Here, we evaluate the performances of S100B and H-FABP for differentiating between CT-positive and CT-negative patients. A total of 261 patients with a GCS score of 15 and at least one clinical symptom of mTBI were recruited at three different European sites. Blood samples from 172 of them were collected ≤ 6 h after trauma. Patients underwent a CT scan and were dichotomised into CT-positive and CT-negative groups for statistical analyses. H-FABP and S100B levels were measured using commercial kits, and their capacities to detect all CT-positive scans were evaluated, with sensitivity set to 100%. For patients recruited ≤ 6 h after trauma, the CT-positive group demonstrated significantly higher levels of both H-FABP (p = 0.004) and S100B (p = 0.003) than the CT-negative group. At 100% sensitivity, specificity reached 6% (95% CI 2.8-10.7) for S100B and 29% (95% CI 21.4-37.1) for H-FABP. Similar results were obtained when including all the patients recruited, i.e. hospital arrival within 24 h of trauma onset. H-FABP out-performed S100B and thus seems to be an interesting protein for detecting all CT-positive mTBI patients with a GCS score of 15 and at least one clinical symptom.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBrain ConcussionFatty Acid Binding Protein 3Fatty Acid-Binding ProteinsFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsBiomarkersFABP3 protein, humanFatty Acid Binding Protein 3Fatty Acid-Binding ProteinsS100B protein, humanS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit

Identifiers

PMID28419114
PMCPMC5395174
OpenAlexW2607230581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.