Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28419097›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2017

Clinical decision tools are needed to identify HIV-positive patients at high risk for poor outcomes after initiation of antiretroviral therapy.

Margaret L McNairy, Elaine J Abrams, Miriam Rabkin, Wafaa M El-Sadr

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06803316 (Optimizing Care Delivery to Support Reengagement in PLWH Returning to HIV Care After Treatment Lapses in Zambia), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06803316 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing Care Delivery to Support Reengagement in PLWH Returning to HIV Care After Treatment Lapses in Zambia

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCentre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled658ConditionsHIV Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Adherence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margaret L McNairyICAP, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Elaine J AbramsICAP, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Miriam RabkinICAP, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Wafaa M El-SadrICAP, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Margaret McNairy and colleagues highlight the need for clinical decision tools to help identify HIV patients who would benefit from tailored services to avoid poor outcomes such as death and loss to follow-up.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveDecision Support TechniquesAdultAnti-HIV AgentsChildFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMalePrognosisResearch DesignRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID28419097
PMCPMC5395167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.