Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28419091›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2017

Multidrug-resistant bacteria compensate for the epistasis between resistances.

Jorge Moura de Sousa, Roberto Balbontín, Paulo Durão, Isabel Gordo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Epistasis decreases with increasing antibiotic pressure but not temperature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge Moura de SousaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Roberto BalbontínInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Paulo DurãoInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Isabel GordoInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-5143
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations conferring resistance to antibiotics are typically costly in the absence of the drug, but bacteria can reduce this cost by acquiring compensatory mutations. Thus, the rate of acquisition of compensatory mutations and their effects are key for the maintenance and dissemination of antibiotic resistances. While compensation for single resistances has been extensively studied, compensatory evolution of multiresistant bacteria remains unexplored. Importantly, since resistance mutations often interact epistatically, compensation of multiresistant bacteria may significantly differ from that of single-resistant strains. We used experimental evolution, next-generation sequencing, in silico simulations, and genome editing to compare the compensatory process of a streptomycin and rifampicin double-resistant Escherichia coli with those of single-resistant clones. We demonstrate that low-fitness double-resistant bacteria compensate faster than single-resistant strains due to the acquisition of compensatory mutations with larger effects. Strikingly, we identified mutations that only compensate for double resistance, being neutral or deleterious in sensitive or single-resistant backgrounds. Moreover, we show that their beneficial effects strongly decrease or disappear in conditions where the epistatic interaction between resistance alleles is absent, demonstrating that these mutations compensate for the epistasis. In summary, our data indicate that epistatic interactions between antibiotic resistances, leading to large fitness costs, possibly open alternative paths for rapid compensatory evolution, thereby potentially stabilizing costly multiple resistances in bacterial populations.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticMutationAllelesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBase SequenceDirected Molecular EvolutionDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenetic FitnessMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPeptide Elongation FactorsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coli ProteinsNusG protein, E coliPeptide Elongation FactorsRibosomal Proteinsribosomal protein S10RifampinStreptomycinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28419091
PMCPMC5395140
OpenAlexW2607012049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.