Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28418920›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2017

Complementary utility of targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry panels as a screening platform to select targeted therapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Hyo Song Kim, Hanna Lee, Su-Jin Shin, Seung-Hoon Beom, Minkyu Jung, Sujin Bae, Eun Young Lee, Kyu Hyun Park, Yoon Young Choi, Taeil Son and 14 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Anti-tumor activities ofJournal of ginseng research · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hyo Song KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hanna LeeSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su-Jin ShinHanyang University, College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Hoon BeomDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minkyu JungDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sujin BaeSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Young LeeSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Hyun ParkCancer Metastasis Research Center, Song Dang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Young ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Taeil SonDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung-Il KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Ho CheongDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woo Jin HyungDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun Chul ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Kwan ShinDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Kil LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong Chan LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woong Sub KoomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon Seok LimDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Cheol ChungDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hoon NohDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun Young RhaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyunki KimHanyang University, College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Soonmyung PaikSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KRHanyang University · KRSeverance Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the clinical utility of combined profiling of Ion Torrent PGM based next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for assignment to molecularly targeted therapies. A consecutive cohort of 93 patients with advanced/metastatic GC who underwent palliative chemotherapy between March and December 2015 were prospectively enrolled. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor biopsy specimens were subjected to a 10 GC panels [Epstein Barr virus encoding RNA in-situ hybridization, IHC for mismatch repair proteins (MMR; MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6), receptor tyrosine kinases (HER2, EGFR, and MET), PTEN, and p53 protein], and a commercial targeted NGS panel of 52 genes (Oncomine Focus Assay). Treatment was based on availability of targeted agents at the time of molecular diagnosis. Among the 81 cases with available tumor samples, complete NGS and IHC profiles were successfully achieved in 66 cases (81.5%); only IHC results were available for 15 cases. Eight cases received matched therapy based on sequencing results; ERBB2 amplification, trastuzumab (n = 4); PIK3CA mutation, Akt inhibitor (n = 2); and FGFR2 amplification, FGFR2b inhibitor (n = 2). Eleven cases received matched therapy based on IHC; ERBB2 positivity, trastuzumab (n = 5); PTEN loss (n = 2), PI3Kβ inhibitor; MMR deficiency (n = 2), PD-1 inhibitor; and EGFR positivity (n = 2), pan-ERBB inhibitor. A total of 19 (23.5%) and 62 (76.5%) cases were treated with matched and non-matched therapy, respectively. Matched therapy had significantly higher overall response rate than non-matched therapy (55.6% vs 13.1%, P = 0.001). NGS and IHC markers provide complementary utility in identifying patients who may benefit from targeted therapies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFeasibility StudiesFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorgastric cancerimmunohistochemistrymatched therapymolecular subtypesnext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28418920
PMCPMC5503540
OpenAlexW2602319034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.