Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28418916›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Clinicopathologic study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.

Shen-Li Tang, Ji-Qiao Yang, Zheng-Gui Du, Qiu-Wen Tan, Yu-Ting Zhou, Di Zhang, Qing Lv

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rare Breast Cancers Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A rare case of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shen-Li TangDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 610041, P.R. China.
Ji-Qiao YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 610041, P.R. China.
Zheng-Gui DuDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 610041, P.R. China.
Qiu-Wen TanDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 610041, P.R. China.
Yu-Ting ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 610041, P.R. China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 610041, P.R. China.
Qing LvDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 610041, P.R. China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a rare subtype of breast carcinoma. It is presumed to be more aggressive than invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), though it is uncertain whether the prognoses of IMPC and IDC differ. In this retrospective study, we compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival between 170 female patients with IMPC (pure or mixed with IDC) and 728 with pure IDC. The IMPC patients had higher clinical stages and histologic grades, higher incidences of lymphovascular invasion and axillary lymph node extracapsular extension, and a higher degree of lymph node involvement than IDC patients. Moreover, IMPC was associated with increases in estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positivity and HER-2 overexpression. Although locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were poorer in IMPC patients than IDC patients, overall survival and distant metastasis survival did not differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that IMPC was an independent prognostic factor for LRRFS in breast cancer, and IMPC patients had poorer clinicopathologic characteristics and poorer RFS and LRRFS than IDC patients. We therefore suggest that to improve treatment decisions, patients with breast carcinoma be tested for the presence of this specific subtype.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, PapillaryCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRecurrenceRetrospective Studiesbreast cancerinvasive micropapillary carcinomalocoregional recurrenceprognostic factorssurvival

Identifiers

PMID28418916
PMCPMC5522079
OpenAlexW2601348099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.