Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28418757›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2017

Visual Circuits for Direction Selectivity.

Alex S Mauss, Anna Vlasits, Alexander Borst, Marla Feller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Imprecision in Vision: Lessons From Neural Circuits in the Fly.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cholinergic Waves Have a Modest Influence on the Transcriptome of Retinal Ganglion Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Retinal ganglion cells encode the direction of motion outside their classical receptive field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transformation of Motion Pattern Selectivity from Retina to Superior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neural Circuits Underlying Multifeature Extraction in the Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex S MaussMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, 82152 Martinsried, Germany; email: amauss@neuro.mpg.de , aborst@neuro.mpg.de.
Anna VlasitsDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology & Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; email: avlasits@berkeley.edu , mfeller@berkeley.edu.
Alexander BorstMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, 82152 Martinsried, Germany; email: amauss@neuro.mpg.de , aborst@neuro.mpg.de.
Marla FellerDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology & Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; email: avlasits@berkeley.edu , mfeller@berkeley.edu.

Funding

The Function of Neural Activity in Developing RetinaR01EY013528 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Marla Feller · 2002 to 2026
$8.1M
Development of direction selectivity in the retinaR01EY019498 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Marla Feller · 2009 to 2026
$6.6M
Dendritic Integration and Direction Selectivity in Starburst Amacrine CellsF31NS089197 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI VLASITS, ANNA · 2014 to 2016
$93k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013528NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019498NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS089197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Images projected onto the retina of an animal eye are rarely still. Instead, they usually contain motion signals originating either from moving objects or from retinal slip caused by self-motion. Accordingly, motion signals tell the animal in which direction a predator, prey, or the animal itself is moving. At the neural level, visual motion detection has been proposed to extract directional information by a delay-and-compare mechanism, representing a classic example of neural computation. Neurons responding selectively to motion in one but not in the other direction have been identified in many systems, most prominently in the mammalian retina and the fly optic lobe. Technological advances have now allowed researchers to characterize these neurons' upstream circuits in exquisite detail. Focusing on these upstream circuits, we review and compare recent progress in understanding the mechanisms that generate direction selectivity in the early visual system of mammals and flies.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMotionMotion PerceptionNeuronsRetinaVisual Pathwaysdirection selectivitymotion detectionoptic loberetinavisual system

Identifiers

PMID28418757
PMCPMC6893907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.