ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2017
U
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- StrainMake: reproducible hybrid metagenomics with MAG recovery and strain-level resolution.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Seven quick tips for gene-focused computational pangenomic analysis.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Pseudogenomic insights into the evolution of Mycobacterium ulcerans.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Draft Genome Sequence and Annotation of the Halotolerant Carotenoid-Producing Strain Paracoccus bogoriensis BOG6Microbiology resource announcements · 2023Article
- Genome assembly composition of the String "ACGT" array: a review of data structure accuracy and performance challenges.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- CStone: A de novo transcriptome assembler for short-read data that identifies non-chimeric contigs based on underlying graph structure.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- The effect of variant interference on de novo assembly for viral deep sequencing.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- New approaches for metagenome assembly with short reads.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- Near-Complete Human Sapovirus Genome Sequences from Kenya.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Characterization of the Genome Sequences of Enterovirus C109 from Two Respiratory Disease Cases in Florida, 2016.Microbiology resource announcements · 2018Article
- Genetic diversity of human sapovirus across the Americas.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies enable routine genome sequencing, generating millions of short reads. A crucial step for full genome analysis is the de novo assembly, and currently, performance of different assembly methods is measured by a metric called N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.