Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28418615›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2017

Co-expression of GR79 EPSPS and GAT yields herbicide-resistant cotton with low glyphosate residues.

Chengzhen Liang, Bao Sun, Zhigang Meng, Zhaohong Meng, Yuan Wang, Guoqing Sun, Tao Zhu, Wei Lu, Wei Zhang, Waqas Malik and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Co-expression ofaBIOTECH · 2023
    Article
  13. Identification and Expression Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Naturally EvolvedFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  20. Transgenic Cotton (Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chengzhen LiangBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Bao SunBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhigang MengBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhaohong MengBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuan WangBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Guoqing SunBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tao ZhuBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wei LuBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wei ZhangBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Waqas MalikBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Min LinBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Rui ZhangBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Sandui GuoBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNBiotechnology Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops have been adopted on a massive scale by North and South American farmers. Currently, about 80% of the 120 million hectares of the global genetically modified (GM) crops are GR crop varieties. However, the adoption of GR plants in China has not occurred at the same pace, owing to several factors including, among other things, labour markets and the residual effects of glyphosate in transgenic plants. Here, we report the co-expression of codon-optimized forms of GR79 EPSPS and N-acetyltransferase (GAT) genes in cotton. We found five times more resistance to glyphosate with 10-fold reduction in glyphosate residues in two pGR79 EPSPS-pGAT co-expression cotton lines, GGCO2 and GGCO5. The GGCO2 line was used in a hybridization programme to develop new GR cottons. Field trials at five locations during three growing seasons showed that pGR79-pGAT transgenic cotton lines have the same agronomic performance as conventional varieties, but were USD 390-495 cheaper to produce per hectare because of the high cost of conventional weed management practices. Our strategy to pyramid these genes clearly worked and thus offers attractive promise for the engineering and breeding of highly resistant low-glyphosate-residue cotton varieties.

Indexed as

3-Phosphoshikimate 1-CarboxyvinyltransferaseAcetyltransferasesGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic EngineeringGlycineGlyphosateGossypiumHerbicide ResistanceHerbicidesNicotianaPlants, Genetically Modified3-Phosphoshikimate 1-CarboxyvinyltransferaseAcetyltransferasesGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidescottonGATglyphosate residueglyphosate resistantGR79 EPSPS

Identifiers

PMID28418615
PMCPMC5698046
OpenAlexW2605383785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.