ArticleMedical education2017
It's not just what you know: junior trainees' approach to follow-up and documentation.
Article in Medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting doctors' professional identity development through specialist training.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
- Tracking the evolution of medical students' clinical documentation skills: a pilot study leveraging a simulated electronic record and a longitudinal panel data analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Large Language Model-Based Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Documentation in the Electronic Health Record Across Two Institutions: Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- How to be a good clerk on the clinical teaching team: a scoping review.Canadian medical education journal · 2024Article
- Local Validation of a National Orthopaedic Registry.Cureus · 2024Article
- Documentation as composing: how medical students and residents use writing to think and learn.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023Article
- Electronic Health Records as an Educational Tool: Viewpoint.JMIR medical education · 2018Article
- Clinician-directed improvement in the accuracy of hospital clinical coding.Future healthcare journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextIn teaching hospitals, junior trainees (first-year residents and third-year medical students) are responsible for patient follow-up and documentation under the supervision of senior team members. In order to support trainees in their role, supervisors need to understand how trainees approach these tasks and how they can be coached to develop best practices.
objectivesThe purpose of our study was to explore the range of practices used by junior trainees in clinical settings.
methodsConstructivist grounded theory was used to guide the collection and analysis of data on follow-up and documentation during 34 observation periods with 17 junior trainees. Data sources included field notes, field interviews and de-identified copies of patient charts. We also held two focus groups with four attending physicians in each.
resultsWe were able to describe three interrelated characteristics that influenced a trainee's approach to and ability to perform the tasks of patient follow-up and documentation: (i) diligence; (ii) relationship to the team (dependent, independent, collaborative), and (iii) level of performance (Data Gatherer, Sensemaker, Manager). Diligence and relationship to the team appeared to influence the quality and focus of a trainee's approach at all levels of performance. Level of performance was felt, by focus group attending physicians, to reflect a developmental progression of knowledge and skills.
conclusionsOur findings contribute to the existing literature in three ways. Firstly, they extend our understanding of how junior trainees approach the task of in-patient follow-up and clinical documentation and the value of those activities. Secondly, they provide new insights to support formative and summative assessment. Finally, they contribute to a growing body of literature exploring the factors that impact trainees' roles and interactions with the team. Future research should focus on validating our findings and exploring their utility in the development of novel assessment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.