Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28418205›Full record

ArticleMedical education2017

It's not just what you know: junior trainees' approach to follow-up and documentation.

Dani C Cadieux, Mark Goldszmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Documentation as composing: how medical students and residents use writing to think and learn.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dani C CadieuxCentre for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mark GoldszmidtCentre for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIn teaching hospitals, junior trainees (first-year residents and third-year medical students) are responsible for patient follow-up and documentation under the supervision of senior team members. In order to support trainees in their role, supervisors need to understand how trainees approach these tasks and how they can be coached to develop best practices.

objectivesThe purpose of our study was to explore the range of practices used by junior trainees in clinical settings.

methodsConstructivist grounded theory was used to guide the collection and analysis of data on follow-up and documentation during 34 observation periods with 17 junior trainees. Data sources included field notes, field interviews and de-identified copies of patient charts. We also held two focus groups with four attending physicians in each.

resultsWe were able to describe three interrelated characteristics that influenced a trainee's approach to and ability to perform the tasks of patient follow-up and documentation: (i) diligence; (ii) relationship to the team (dependent, independent, collaborative), and (iii) level of performance (Data Gatherer, Sensemaker, Manager). Diligence and relationship to the team appeared to influence the quality and focus of a trainee's approach at all levels of performance. Level of performance was felt, by focus group attending physicians, to reflect a developmental progression of knowledge and skills.

conclusionsOur findings contribute to the existing literature in three ways. Firstly, they extend our understanding of how junior trainees approach the task of in-patient follow-up and clinical documentation and the value of those activities. Secondly, they provide new insights to support formative and summative assessment. Finally, they contribute to a growing body of literature exploring the factors that impact trainees' roles and interactions with the team. Future research should focus on validating our findings and exploring their utility in the development of novel assessment strategies.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDocumentationStudents, MedicalFollow-Up StudiesHumansMedical Staff, Hospital

Identifiers

PMID28418205
PMCPMC5518220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.