ArticleMedical education2017
Student-derived solutions to address barriers hindering reports of unprofessional behaviour.
Article in Medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ignorance Is Not Bliss: A Systematic Review on the Impact of Ignoring UK Medical Students During Clinical Placements.Cureus · 2025Review
- Raising professionalism concerns as a medical student: damned if they do, damned if they don't?BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The institutional impact after enacting student solutions to decrease barriers in reporting unprofessional behaviors.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2019Article
- Investigating US medical students' motivation to respond to lapses in professionalism.Medical education · 2018Article
- Improving patient safety by enhancing raising concerns at medical school.BMC medical education · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBarriers hinder medical students from reporting breaches in professional behaviour, which can adversely impact institutional culture. No studies have reported student perspectives on how to address these barriers successfully. Our study (i) evaluated the likelihood of reporting based on violation severity, (ii) assessed barriers to reporting and (iii) elicited students' proposed solutions.
methodsFour medical students designed a cross-sectional study in 2015. In response to seven scenarios, students rated the likelihood of reporting the violation, indicated perceived barriers and identified solutions. Additional questions investigated the perceived importance of professionalism, confidence in understanding professionalism and trust in administrative protection from negative consequences.
resultsTwo hundred and seventy-two students in their clinical years (MS2-4) responded to the survey (RR = 50%). Students were 70-90% likely to report major violations, but < 30% likely to report minor or moderate violations. Barriers included concerns about an uncomfortable relationship (41%), potential negative repercussions on grades or opportunities (23%), and addressing by direct discussion rather than reporting (23%). Solutions included simplified reporting, control over report release date, improved feedback to reporters, training for real-time resolution of concerns and a neutral resource to help students triage concerns. No differences existed between classes regarding the importance or understanding of professionalism. In linear regression, only importance of professionalism predicted likelihood of reporting and this did not change with training.
conclusionsHindered by common barriers, students are unlikely to report a violation unless it is a serious breach of professionalism. Student-derived solutions should be explored by medical school administrators to encourage reporting of violation of professionalism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.