ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2017
Longitudinal assessment of urinary PCA3 for predicting prostate cancer grade reclassification in favorable-risk men during active surveillance.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS).Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Trial
- Article
- Risk of reclassification and novel tools in active surveillance.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Clinical assessment of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 in Chinese population: a large-scale, prospective and multicenter study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Designing a Simple Electrochemical Genosensor for the Detection of Urinary PCA3, a Prostate Cancer Biomarker.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Is Active Surveillance Too Active?Current urology reports · 2023Review
- Genome-wide studies in prostate cancer poised liquid biopsy as a molecular discovery tool.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Molecular Biomarkers for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.European urology open science · 2022Review
- Clinical Applications of Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer: From Screening to Predictive Biomarker.Cancers · 2022Review
- Association of MyProstateScore (MPS) with prostate cancer grade in the radical prostatectomy specimen.Urologic oncology · 2022Article
- Liquid biomarkers in active surveillance.World journal of urology · 2022Review
- Review
- Tissue- and Liquid-Based Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: Role of Available Biomarkers in Daily Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: From Current Knowledge to the Role of Metabolomics and Exosomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021Review
- Comprehensive Characterization of Common and Cancer-Specific Differently Expressed lncRNAs in Urologic Cancers.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- Data-driven translational prostate cancer research: from biomarker discovery to clinical decision.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the utility of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) as both a one-time and longitudinal measure in men on active surveillance (AS).
methodsThe Johns Hopkins AS program monitors men with favorable-risk prostate cancer with serial PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate biopsy. Since 2007, post-DRE urinary specimens have also been routinely obtained. Men with multiple PCA3 measures obtained over ⩾3 years of monitoring were included. Utility of first PCA3 score (fPCA3), subsequent PCA3 (sPCA3) and change in PCA3 were assessed for prediction of Gleason grade reclassification (GR, Gleason score >6) during follow-up.
resultsIn total, 260 men met study criteria. Median time from enrollment to fPCA3 was 2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1-3) and from fPCA3 to sPCA3 was 5 years (IQR 4-6). During median follow-up of 6 years (IQR 5-8), 28 men (11%) underwent GR. Men with GR had higher median fPCA3 (48.0 vs 24.5, P=0.007) and sPCA3 (63.5 vs 36.0, P=0.002) than those without GR, while longitudinal change in PCA3 did not differ by GR status (log-normalized rate 0.07 vs 0.06, P=0.53). In a multivariable model including age, risk classification and PSA density, fPCA3 remained significantly associated with GR (log(fPCA3) odds ratio=1.77, P=0.04).
conclusionsPCA3 scores obtained during AS were higher in men who underwent GR, but the rate of change in PCA3 over time did not differ by GR status. PCA3 was a significant predictor of GR in a multivariable model including conventional risk factors, suggesting that PCA3 provides incremental prognostic information in the AS setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.