Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28417591›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2018

Effective mosquito and arbovirus surveillance using metabarcoding.

J Batovska, S E Lynch, N O I Cogan, K Brown, J M Darbro, E A Kho, M J Blacket

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Host Feeding Patterns ofBiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J BatovskaAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Vic, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-568X
S E LynchAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Vic, Australia.
N O I CoganAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Vic, Australia.
K BrownAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Vic, Australia.
J M DarbroMosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
E A KhoMosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
M J BlacketAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Vic, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-5712

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective vector and arbovirus surveillance requires timely and accurate screening techniques that can be easily upscaled. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a high-throughput technology that has the potential to modernize vector surveillance. When combined with DNA barcoding, it is termed 'metabarcoding.' The aim of our study was to establish a metabarcoding protocol to characterize pools of mosquitoes and screen them for virus. Pools contained 100 morphologically identified individuals, including one Ross River virus (RRV) infected mosquito, with three species present at different proportions: 1, 5, 94%. Nucleic acid extracted from both crude homogenate and supernatant was used to amplify a 269-bp section of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) locus. Additionally, a 67-bp region of the RRV E2 gene was amplified from synthesized cDNA to screen for RRV. Amplicon sequencing was performed using an Illumina MiSeq, and bioinformatic analysis was performed using a DNA barcode database of Victorian mosquitoes. Metabarcoding successfully detected all mosquito species and RRV in every positive sample tested. The limits of species detection were also examined by screening a pool of 1000 individuals, successfully identifying the species and RRV from a single mosquito. The primers used for amplification, number of PCR cycles and total number of individuals present all have effects on the quantification of species in mixed bulk samples. Based on the results, a number of recommendations for future metabarcoding studies are presented. Overall, metabarcoding shows great promise for providing a new alternative approach to screening large insect surveillance trap catches.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAnimalsComputational BiologyDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEntomologyMetagenomicsMosquito VectorsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRoss River virusSequence Analysis, DNAbulk sampleCulicidaecytochrome c oxidase subunit IDNA barcodingpooled samplesvirus

Identifiers

PMID28417591
PMCPMC5811807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.