ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2017
Unilateral external fixator in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: results of a single center retrospective study.
Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of our work is to evaluate and critically analyze long-term clinical and radiological data of a new unilateral external fixator (MIKAI KIT FEP©-Mikai S.p.A, Genoa, Italy), in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe reviewed 47 patients affected by humeral fractures that underwent surgery from July 2010 to March 2016 with unilateral external fixator. Demographic characteristics of the patients were recorded, which included age, sex and baseline comorbidities and mechanism of injury. Surgical data such as time of surgery and time of fixation according to AO-type of fracture, clinical objective and subjective outcomes were collected.
resultsThe mean follow-up was 50.4 months (range 12-74). The patients' average age was 41.8 years (range 14-92). Mean surgical time was 66.8 (±37.7 min); and mean time of fixation was 4.5 (±1.7 months). We observed five delayed union (10.6%); one refracture (2.1%); and one case of non-union (2.1%) who underwent a revision surgery with nailing. No malunion was detected. Average quick-DASH was 11.7 (±14.8). The mean Constant Score at final follow-up was 81.5 (±14). 95.8% of patients were satisfied of our treatment. According to SF-12 scores, we observed 44 (93.6%) good results and 3 (6.4%) poor results.
conclusionWe suggest the use of MIKAI KIT FEP© as a feasible option in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. We reported optimal clinical and radiological outcomes at long-term follow-up. We advocate more powerful evidence to validate this new possible approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.