Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28417267›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2017

Preemptive warfarin dose reduction after initiation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim or metronidazole.

Anna Powers, Erin B Loesch, Anthony Weiland, Nicole Fioravanti, David Lucius

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Model-Based Evaluation of the Warfarin-Sulfamethoxazole Drug-Drug Interaction.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Drug Interactions Affecting Oral Anticoagulant Use.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Preemptive Dose Adjustment Effect on the Quality of Anticoagulation Management in Warfarin Patients With Drug Interactions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna PowersDayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4100 West 3rd Street (119), Dayton, OH, 45428, USA. anna.powers2@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4193-1920
Erin B LoeschDayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4100 West 3rd Street (119), Dayton, OH, 45428, USA.
Anthony WeilandDayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4100 West 3rd Street (119), Dayton, OH, 45428, USA.
Nicole FioravantiCincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
David LuciusDayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4100 West 3rd Street (119), Dayton, OH, 45428, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the utility of a preemptive warfarin dose reduction at the time of initiation of either sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim or metronidazole, a retrospective chart review of patients who received an outpatient prescription for warfarin and either sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and/or metronidazole from July 1, 2011 to July 1, 2015 was conducted. Clinical outcomes compared Veterans who had a warfarin dose reduction and those who did not within 120 h (5 days) of antibiotic initiation. The primary outcome compared the pre-and post-antibiotic International Normalized Ratio (INR) of patients in the intervention group (warfarin dose reduction) with those in the control group (no intervention). Secondary outcomes assessed incidence of thromboembolic and major bleeding events within 30 days of antibiotic completion. Fifty patients were assessed. Forty-nine patients had at least one follow-up appointment; 126 follow-up visits were evaluated. There was a statistically significant difference for the change in therapeutic INR at the first follow-up appointment (p = 0.029) for those patients in the control group. On average, the patients in the intervention group required fewer follow-up visits (p = 0.019). There were no statistically significant differences for the overall rate of therapeutic INR values between groups, as well as no instances of a thromboembolic or major bleeding events during the follow-up period. Clinically significant differences were observed for patients who received a preemptive warfarin dose reduction upon initiation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim or metronidazole. Patients in the intervention group required fewer follow-up appointments and were more likely maintain a therapeutic INR within the 30 days following the antibiotic course. Results of this study will be presented the at Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee in an effort to seek approval for policy development to initiate a local preemptive warfarin dose adjustment as a standard of practice.

Indexed as

HemorrhageInternational Normalized RatioThromboembolismWarfarinAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMetronidazoleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationMetronidazoleTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationWarfarinAnticoagulationDrug-interactionINR controlMetronidazoleSulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimWarfarin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.