Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28417249›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2017

Virus-vector relationship in the Citrus leprosis pathosystem.

Aline Daniele Tassi, Laura Cristina Garita-Salazar, Lilian Amorim, Valdenice Moreira Novelli, Juliana Freitas-Astúa, Carl C Childers, Elliot W Kitajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Circulative Transmission of Cileviruses inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aline Daniele TassiDepartamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 9, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8622-5977
Laura Cristina Garita-SalazarDepartamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 9, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.
Lilian AmorimDepartamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 9, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.
Valdenice Moreira NovelliInstituto Agronômico de Campinas, Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira, CP 4, Cordeirópolis, SP, 13490-900, Brazil.
Juliana Freitas-AstúaEmbrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Cruz das Almas, BA, 44380-000, Brazil.
Carl C ChildersCitrus Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL, 33850, USA.
Elliot W KitajimaDepartamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 9, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil. ewkitaji@usp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citrus leprosis has been one of the most destructive diseases of citrus in the Americas. In the last decade important progress has been achieved such as the complete genome sequencing of its main causal agent, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV-C), belonging to a new genus Cilevirus. It is transmitted by Brevipalpus yothersi Baker (Acari: Tenuipalpidae), and is characterized by the localized symptoms it induces on the leaves, fruits and stems. It occurs in the American continents from Mexico to Argentina. The virus was until recently considered restricted to Citrus spp. However, it was found naturally infecting other plants species as Swinglea glutinosa Merrill and Commelina benghalensis L., and has been experimentally transmitted by B. yothersi to a large number of plant species. Despite these advances little is known about the virus-vector relationship that is a key to understanding the epidemiology of the disease. Some components of the CiLV-C/B. yothersi relationship were determined using the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. 'IAC Una') as a test plant. They included: (a) the virus acquisition access period was 4 h; (b) the virus inoculation access period was 2 h; (c) the latent period between acquisition and inoculation was 7 h; (d) the period of retention of the virus by a single viruliferous mite was at least 12 days; (d) the percentage of viruliferous individuals from mite colonies on infected tissues ranged from 25 to 60%. The experiments confirmed previous data that all developmental stages of B. yothersi (larva, protonymph and deutonymph, adult female and male) were able to transmit CiLV-C and that transovarial transmission of the virus did not occur. CiLV-C can be acquired from lesions on leaves, fruits and stems by B. yothersi. Based on the distribution of lesions produced by single viruliferous B. yothersi on bean leaves, it is concluded that they tend to feed in restricted areas, usually near the veins. The short latent and transmission periods during the larval stage suggest that the CiLV-C/B. yothersi relationship is of the persistent circulative type.

Indexed as

CitrusAcariAnimalsArgentinaArthropod VectorsFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsMaleMexicoPlant VirusesBrevipalpus yothersiEpidemiologyLatent periodVirus access acquisition periodVirus access inoculation period

Identifiers

PMID28417249
PMCPMC5403852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.