Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28417195›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017

RRx-001 protects against cisplatin-induced toxicities.

Bryan Oronsky, Tony R Reid, Christopher Larson, Corey A Carter, Christina E Brzezniak, Arnold Oronsky, Pedro Cabrales

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Advances and challenges in immunotherapy of small cell lung cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. What's New in SCLC? A Review.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan OronskyEpicentRx Inc, 4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA. boronsky@epicentrx.com.
Tony R ReidMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Dr, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Christopher LarsonMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Dr, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Corey A CarterWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christina E BrzezniakWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Arnold OronskyInterWest Partners, 2710 Sand Hill Road #200, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Pedro CabralesDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRRx-001, a minimally toxic tumor-associated macrophage and neutrophil-repolarizing agent, is under investigation in Phase II clinical trials as a sensitizer/resensitizer to cisplatin and carboplatin. On the basis of anecdotal clinical observations of improved platinum tolerability following a priming period with RRx-001 as well as preclinical studies that have previously demonstrated radioprotection of intestinal stem cells and cardioprotection from doxorubicin, the in vivo cytoprotective potential of RRx-001 pretreatment against cisplatin-induced bone marrow suppression and renal toxicity was investigated.

methodsBALB/c mice were divided into three groups: (1) no treatment, (2) vehicle and cisplatin only, and (3) RRx-001 and cisplatin. RRx-001 treatment (5 mg/kg every other day for 3 days) was initiated 3 days prior to cisplatin administration. Blood was collected from the femoral vein at different intervals to measure total hemoglobin and leukocyte counts as well as renal functional markers (serum urea, creatinine and creatinine clearance). Metaphase spreads were prepared from whole bone marrow cells as markers of clastogenicity.

resultsRRx-001 pretreatment significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the mean total chromosome aberration frequency per metaphase in the RRx-001 and cisplatin group compared to the cisplatin-only group was observed.

conclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate that RRx-001 has nephro-, geno- and myeloprotective effects in vivo. Importantly, RRx-001 did not protect sarcoma-180 solid tumor xenografts against cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity. These results potentially support the use of RRx-001 as a chemoprotector against cisplatin-induced toxicities.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAzetidinesCisplatinMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNitro CompoundsRandom AllocationAntineoplastic AgentsAzetidinesCisplatinNitro CompoundsRRx-001ChemoprotectionCisplatinMyeloprotectionRRx-001Toxicity sparing

Identifiers

PMID28417195
PMCPMC11819312
OpenAlexW2606004385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.