ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017
RRx-001 protects against cisplatin-induced toxicities.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Results from a biomarker study to accompany a phase II trial of RRx-001 with reintroduced platinum-based chemotherapy in relapsed small cell carcinoma.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2021Trial
- A Review of RRx-001: A Late-Stage Multi-Indication Inhibitor of NLRP3 Activation and Chronic Inflammation.Drugs · 2023Review
- A multicenter, phase 1, dose escalation clinical trial (G-FORCE-1) of XRT, RRx-001 and temozolomide followed by temozolomide +/- RRx-001 in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A 2022 Update on Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC).Journal of Cancer · 2022Review
- RRx-001 Radioprotection: Enhancement of Survival and Hematopoietic Recovery in Gamma-Irradiated Mice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Advances and challenges in immunotherapy of small cell lung cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020Article
- Nitric Oxide-Mediated Enhancement and Reversal of Resistance of Anticancer Therapies.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- RRx-001 protects normal tissues but not tumors via Nrf2 induction and Bcl-2 inhibition.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019Article
- Platelet inhibitory effects of the Phase 3 anticancer and normal tissue cytoprotective agent, RRx-001.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2018Article
- A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis.Translational oncology · 2018Review
- What's New in SCLC? A Review.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Review
- A Recurrent Platinum Refractory Ovarian Cancer Patient With a Partial Response After RRx-001 Resensitization to Platinum Doublet.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRRx-001, a minimally toxic tumor-associated macrophage and neutrophil-repolarizing agent, is under investigation in Phase II clinical trials as a sensitizer/resensitizer to cisplatin and carboplatin. On the basis of anecdotal clinical observations of improved platinum tolerability following a priming period with RRx-001 as well as preclinical studies that have previously demonstrated radioprotection of intestinal stem cells and cardioprotection from doxorubicin, the in vivo cytoprotective potential of RRx-001 pretreatment against cisplatin-induced bone marrow suppression and renal toxicity was investigated.
methodsBALB/c mice were divided into three groups: (1) no treatment, (2) vehicle and cisplatin only, and (3) RRx-001 and cisplatin. RRx-001 treatment (5 mg/kg every other day for 3 days) was initiated 3 days prior to cisplatin administration. Blood was collected from the femoral vein at different intervals to measure total hemoglobin and leukocyte counts as well as renal functional markers (serum urea, creatinine and creatinine clearance). Metaphase spreads were prepared from whole bone marrow cells as markers of clastogenicity.
resultsRRx-001 pretreatment significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the mean total chromosome aberration frequency per metaphase in the RRx-001 and cisplatin group compared to the cisplatin-only group was observed.
conclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate that RRx-001 has nephro-, geno- and myeloprotective effects in vivo. Importantly, RRx-001 did not protect sarcoma-180 solid tumor xenografts against cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity. These results potentially support the use of RRx-001 as a chemoprotector against cisplatin-induced toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.