ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017
Impact of BCL2 polymorphisms on survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Biomarkers of Bladder Cancer: A Mini-Review.Physiological research · 2023Review
- Systematic Review: Genetic Associations for Prognostic Factors of Urinary Bladder Cancer.Biomarkers in cancer · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the impact of three BCL2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, i.e., c.-938C>A (rs2279115), c.21G>A (rs1801018), and c.*2203A>G (rs4987853) on survival in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
methodsWe analyzed 179 patients who underwent surgical treatment for bladder cancer at the Clinic of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Germany. Genomic DNA was extracted and genotyped for the polymorphisms. For all polymorphisms, linkage analysis was performed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the putative impact of the three polymorphisms on outcome.
resultsc.-938C>A and c.21G>A, but not c.*2203A>G, are in strong linkage disequilibrium (D' 0.96). We found a significant association between c.-938C>A and relapse-free survival (p = 0.024) with an allele dose effect. In the same way, c.21G>A had a significant impact on both relapse-free survival (p = 0.009) and progression-free survival (p = 0.012), as well as a pronounced allele dose effect. Regression analysis proved c.21G>A and c.-938C>A, to be an independent risk factor in univariate and multivariable analyses.
conclusionsIn our cohort, both c.-938C>A and c.21G>A showed a significant impact on outcome with TCC of the bladder. Due to the linkage disequilibrium of both SNPs, maybe, only one of them could mediate this effect. In multivariable analysis, however, both proved to be independently associated with overall survival. Contrary to other findings which found the c.-938C>A mainly influencing outcome, our data may suggest that the main effect on TCC could be due to the c.21G>A polymorphism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.