Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28417181›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2017

Colonic inflammation in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: detection with magnetic resonance enterography.

Alessandro Campari, Marcello Napolitano, Giovanna Zuin, Luciano Maestri, Giovanni Di Leo, Francesco Sardanelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro CampariRadiology Department, E. Bassini Hospital - ASST Nord Milano, via Gorki, 50, 20092, Cinisello Balsamo, Milan, Italy. alessandro.campari@unimi.it.
Marcello NapolitanoPediatric Radiology Department, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital - ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, via Castelvetro 32, 20154, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna ZuinPediatric Department, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital - ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, via Castelvetro 32, 20154, Milan, Italy.
Luciano MaestriPediatric Surgery Department, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital - ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, via Castelvetro 32, 20154, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni Di LeoRadiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Francesco SardanelliRadiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonic involvement in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease is common. Magnetic resonance (MR) enterography is considered the best imaging modality for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease evaluation. It is unclear whether the lack of a dedicated large bowel preparation prevents a reliable colonic assessment.

objectiveTo determine the diagnostic performance of standard MR enterography in detecting and grading colonic inflammatory activity. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated children who underwent both MR enterography and ileocolonoscopy with biopsies <4 weeks apart. Two radiologists independently reviewed MR examinations and quantified inflammation in each of the five colonic segments using a standardized MR score system. Findings were compared with histological examination of the corresponding segment. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Jonckheere-Terpstra and Bland-Altman statistics were used.

resultsOne hundred seventy-five segments from 37 examinations were included. MR enterography diagnostic performance for inflammation was as follows: sensitivity 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90-97%), specificity: 64% (95% CI: 57-71%). A significant positive correlation was found between MR score and inflammatory activity histologically graded (P<0.001, Jonckheere-Terpstra test). The interobserver agreement was good (mean difference between MR enterography scores was -0.03; limits of agreement -2.8 to 2.7).

conclusionStandard MR enterography is sensitive for the detection of actively inflamed colonic segments. MR enterography might provide useful information for guiding biopsies and its role as an alternative to ileocolonoscopy in monitoring colonic disease activity in children should be further investigated.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiopsyChildChild, PreschoolColonic DiseasesColonoscopyContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaChildrenCrohn diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseMagnetic resonance enterographyUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.