ArticlePhotoacoustics2017
Photoacoustic
Article in Photoacoustics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chip-Based Optoacoustic Single-Cell Detection in Flow Using Point-Source Optimized Surface Acoustic Wave Transducers.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Article
- High-Throughput Single-Cell Analysis of Nanoparticle-Cell Interactions.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2023Article
- Simultaneously Acquiring Optical and Acoustic Properties of Individual Microalgae Cells Suspended in Water.Biosensors · 2022Article
- In vitro optoacoustic flow cytometry with light scattering referencing.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Pulsed laser damage of gold nanorods in turbid media and its impact on multi-spectral photoacoustic imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- Dynamic blood flow phantom with negative and positive photoacoustic contrasts.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
- Fluorescence detection, enumeration and characterization of single circulating cells in vivo: technology, applications and future prospects.Physics in medicine and biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional flow cytometry is a versatile tool for drug research and cell characterization. However, it is poorly suited for quantification of non-fluorescent proteins and artificial nanomaterials without the use of additional labeling. The rapid growth of biomedical applications for small non-fluorescent nanoparticles (NPs) for drug delivery and contrast and therapy enhancement, as well as research focused on natural cell pigments and chromophores, demands high-throughput quantification methods for the non-fluorescent components. In this work, we present a novel photoacoustic (PA) fluorescence flow cytometry (PAFFC) platform that combines NP quantification though PA detection with conventional
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.