Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28416993›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2017

Antinociceptive effect of intrathecal sec-O-glucosylhamaudol on the formalin-induced pain in rats.

Sang Hun Kim, Hwa Song Jong, Myung Ha Yoon, Seon Hee Oh, Ki Tae Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrative medicine research · 2023
    Article
  2. Characteristics of Phenolic Compounds inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Therapeutic Potential ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protective Effects ofNutrients · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sang Hun KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
Hwa Song JongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Myung Ha YoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medical School, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Seon Hee OhDepartment of Premedics, School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
Ki Tae JungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe root of

methodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with an intrathecal catheter. Rats were randomly treated with a vehicle and SOG (10 µg, 30 µg, 60 µg, and 100 µg) before formalin injection. Five percent formalin was injected into the hind-paw, and a biphasic reaction followed, consisting of flinching and licking behaviors (phase 1, 0-10 min; phase 2, 10-60 min). Naloxone was injected 10 min before administration of SOG 100 µg to evaluate the involvement of SOG with an opioid receptor. Dose-responsiveness and ED50 values were calculated.

resultsIntrathecal SOG showed a significant reduction of the flinching responses at both phases in a dose-dependent manner. Significant effects were showed from the dose of 30 µg and maximum effects were achieved at a dose of 100 µg in both phases. The ED50 value (95% confidence intervals) of intrathecal SOG was 30.3 (25.8-35.5) µg during phase 1, and 48.0 (41.4-55.7) during phase 2. The antinociceptive effects of SOG (100 µg) were significantly reverted at both phases of the formalin test by naloxone.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that intrathecal SOG has a very strong antinociceptive effect in the formalin test and it seems the effect is related to an opioid receptor.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaFormalin testNociceptionOpioid receptorPeucedanum japonicum Thunb.Sec-O-glucosylhamaudol

Identifiers

PMID28416993
PMCPMC5392663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.