Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28416934›Full record

ReviewThe Eurasian journal of medicine2017

Sepsis and Septic Shock: Current Treatment Strategies and New Approaches.

Gizem Polat, Rustem Anil Ugan, Elif Cadirci, Zekai Halici

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Peripheral perfusion-guided versus routine fluid therapy in sepsis: A randomized controlled pilot trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cannabinoids in preclinical research of sepsis: a scoping review.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gizem PolatTurkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Rustem Anil UganDepartment of Pharmacology, Atatürk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Elif CadirciDepartment of Pharmacology, Atatürk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Zekai HaliciDepartment of Pharmacology, Atatürk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Atatürk University · TRMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a complex condition characterized by the simultaneous activation of inflammation and coagulation in response to microbial insult. These events manifest as systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis symptoms through the release of proinflammatory cytokines, procoagulants, and adhesion molecules from immune cells and/or damaged endothelium. Today, sepsis is a severe multisystem disease with difficult treatments for its manifestations and high mortality rates. In the last two decades in particular, many studies have been conducted on sepsis that cause shock, multiorgan dysfunction, and organ failure by especially leading to hemodynamic changes. In sepsis, increasing antibiotic resistance and medicine-resistant hemodynamic changes have resulted in further research on new treatment modalities in addition to classical treatments. In the last decade, the sepsis physiopathology has been elucidated. Various therapeutic agents have been used in addition to antibiotherapy, but no satisfactory results have been obtained. This review summarizes the sepsis pathophysiology, current treatment protocols, and new approaches.

Indexed as

Critical caresepsisseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID28416934
PMCPMC5389495
OpenAlexW2603563460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.