Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28416691›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Neurophysiological dynamics of phrase-structure building during sentence processing.

Matthew J Nelson, Imen El Karoui, Kristof Giber, Xiaofang Yang, Laurent Cohen, Hilda Koopman, Sydney S Cash, Lionel Naccache, John T Hale, Christophe Pallier and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05283265 (Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Language Comprehension), which is not on this map. Cited by 123 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05283265 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Language Comprehension

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2022 to 2026Enrolled153ConditionsLanguage DisordersArmsSentence Type, Direct brain stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Processing at Phrase Boundaries During Self-Paced Reading.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Building hierarchically nested structure by rapid neural sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Hierarchical dynamic coding coordinates speech comprehension in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Left Perisylvian Rhythms Encode Prosody and Syntax during Delayed Sentence Repetition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A universal of speech timing: Intonation units form low-frequency rhythms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Decoding the Neural Dynamics of Headed Syntactic Structure Building.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matthew J NelsonCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U992, NeuroSpin Center, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; matthew.nelson.neuro@northwestern.edu stanislas.dehaene@cea.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2325-4578
Imen El KarouiInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR7225, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris 6, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière Research Center (ICM), 75013 Paris, France.
Kristof GiberDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114.
Xiaofang YangStanford Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program (SHICEP), Stanford, CA 94305.
Laurent CohenInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR7225, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris 6, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière Research Center (ICM), 75013 Paris, France.
Hilda KoopmanDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Sydney S CashDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114.
Lionel NaccacheInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR7225, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris 6, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière Research Center (ICM), 75013 Paris, France.
John T HaleDepartment of Linguistics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Christophe PallierCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U992, NeuroSpin Center, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3324-666X
Stanislas DehaeneCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U992, NeuroSpin Center, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; matthew.nelson.neuro@northwestern.edu stanislas.dehaene@cea.fr.

Funding

European Research Council 695403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although sentences unfold sequentially, one word at a time, most linguistic theories propose that their underlying syntactic structure involves a tree of nested phrases rather than a linear sequence of words. Whether and how the brain builds such structures, however, remains largely unknown. Here, we used human intracranial recordings and visual word-by-word presentation of sentences and word lists to investigate how left-hemispheric brain activity varies during the formation of phrase structures. In a broad set of language-related areas, comprising multiple superior temporal and inferior frontal sites, high-gamma power increased with each successive word in a sentence but decreased suddenly whenever words could be merged into a phrase. Regression analyses showed that each additional word or multiword phrase contributed a similar amount of additional brain activity, providing evidence for a merge operation that applies equally to linguistic objects of arbitrary complexity. More superficial models of language, based solely on sequential transition probability over lexical and syntactic categories, only captured activity in the posterior middle temporal gyrus. Formal model comparison indicated that the model of multiword phrase construction provided a better fit than probability-based models at most sites in superior temporal and inferior frontal cortices. Activity in those regions was consistent with a neural implementation of a bottom-up or left-corner parser of the incoming language stream. Our results provide initial intracranial evidence for the neurophysiological reality of the merge operation postulated by linguists and suggest that the brain compresses syntactically well-formed sequences of words into a hierarchy of nested phrases.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleSpeechTemporal Lobeconstituentintracranialmergeneurolinguisticsopen nodes

Identifiers

PMID28416691
PMCPMC5422821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.