Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28416679›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Sensorimotor-independent development of hands and tools selectivity in the visual cortex.

Ella Striem-Amit, Gilles Vannuscorps, Alfonso Caramazza

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Action-type mapping principles extend beyond evolutionarily conserved actions, even in people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hand-Selective Visual Regions Represent How to Grasp 3D Tools: Brain Decoding during Real Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2020
    Review
  13. Evidence for an effector-independent action system from people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. What Does Dorsal Cortex Contribute to Perception?Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Plasticity based on compensatory effector use in the association but not primary sensorimotor cortex of people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  20. Artificial limb representation in amputees.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ella Striem-AmitDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; striemamit@fas.harvard.edu.
Gilles VannuscorpsDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Alfonso CaramazzaDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual occipito-temporal cortex is composed of several distinct regions specialized in the identification of different object kinds such as tools and bodies. Its organization appears to reflect not only the visual characteristics of the inputs but also the behavior that can be achieved with them. For example, there are spatially overlapping responses for viewing hands and tools, which is likely due to their common role in object-directed actions. How dependent is occipito-temporal cortex organization on object manipulation and motor experience? To investigate this question, we studied five individuals born without hands (individuals with upper limb dysplasia), who use tools with their feet. Using fMRI, we found the typical selective hand-tool overlap (HTO) not only in typically developed control participants but also in four of the five dysplasics. Functional connectivity of the HTO in the dysplasics also showed a largely similar pattern as in the controls. The preservation of functional organization in the dysplasics suggests that occipito-temporal cortex specialization is driven largely by inherited connectivity constraints that do not require sensorimotor experience. These findings complement discoveries of intact functional organization of the occipito-temporal cortex in people born blind, supporting an organization largely independent of any one specific sensory or motor experience.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryHandAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedUpper Extremity Deformities, CongenitalVisual Cortexbody imagebrain developmentmotor deprivationtool usevisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID28416679
PMCPMC5422761
OpenAlexW2606170334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.