Trial reportHeart (British Cardiac Society)2017
Cardiovascular outcomes with an inhaled beta2-agonist/corticosteroid in patients with COPD at high cardiovascular risk.
Trial report in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01313676 (A Clinical Outcomes Study to Compare the Effect of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol Inhalation Powder 100/25mcg With Placebo on Survival in Subjects With Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Clinical Outcomes Study to Compare the Effect of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol Inhalation Powder 100/25mcg With Placebo on Survival in Subjects With Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and a History of or at Increased Risk for Cardiovascular Disease
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review on long-term adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Pooled it
- Relationship of inhaled long-acting bronchodilators with cardiovascular outcomes among patients with stable COPD: a meta-analysis and systematic review of 43 randomized trials.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Pooled it
- Single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol and umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD: results on cardiovascular safety from the IMPACT trial.Respiratory research · 2020Trial
- A randomized, controlled, repeat-dose study of batefenterol/fluticasone furoate compared with placebo in the treatment of COPD.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2020Trial
- Association of platelet count with all-cause mortality and risk of cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity in stable COPD.Respiratory research · 2019Trial
- Cardiac Troponin I and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018Trial
- Blood pressure, heart rate, and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the SUMMIT trial.European heart journal · 2018Trial
- Long-term safety and efficacy of formoterol fumarate inhalation solution in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseTrial
- Article
- Challenges in the Early Diagnosis, Screening and Management of Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Immunometabolism in heart failure.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- βBiochemistry research international · 2025Review
- The role of glucocorticoids in increasing cardiovascular risk.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Comparative safety of inhaled corticosteroids and macrolides in Medicare enrolees with bronchiectasis.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD and the risk for coronary heart disease: a nationwide cohort study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Benefits and Risks.Clinics in chest medicine · 2020Review
- Shared mechanisms of multimorbidity in COPD, atherosclerosis and type-2 diabetes: the neutrophil as a potential inflammatory target.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020Review
- Potential drug-drug interactions associated with clinical and laboratory findings at hospital admission.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Article
- A mini review of inhaled beta 2 agonists in acute decompensated heart failure requiring respiratory support.Pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2019Article
- Cardiovascular Comorbidities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)-Current Considerations for Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often coexist. We assessed the effect of inhaled COPD treatments on CVD outcomes and safety in patients with COPD and at heightened CVD risk.
methodsThe SUMMIT (Study to Understand Mortality and MorbidITy) was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial in 16 485 patients with moderate COPD who had or were at high risk of CVD. Here, we assessed the prespecified secondary endpoint of time to first on-treatment composite CVD event (CVD death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina or transient ischaemic attack (TIA)) by Cox regression and by clinician-reported CVD adverse events across the four groups: once-daily inhaled placebo (n=4111), long-acting beta
resultsParticipants were predominantly middle-aged (mean 65 (SD 8) years) men (75%) with overt CVD (66%). The composite CVD endpoint occurred in 688 patients (first event: sudden death (35%), acute coronary syndrome (37%) and stroke or TIA (23%), and was not reduced in any treatment group versus placebo: VI (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.22), FF (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.11) and their combination (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.14). Outcomes were similar among all subgroups. Adverse events, including palpitations and arrhythmias, did not differ by treatment.
conclusionsIn patients with COPD with moderate airflow limitation and heightened CVD risk, treatment with inhaled VI, FF or their combination has an excellent safety profile and does not impact CVD outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01313676.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.