Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28416543›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Potential Toxicity of Polymyxins in Human Lung Epithelial Cells.

Maizbha U Ahmed, Tony Velkov, Yu-Wei Lin, Bo Yun, Cameron J Nowell, Fanfan Zhou, Qi Tony Zhou, Kim Chan, Mohammad A K Azad, Jian Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Iturin A disruptsNpj fungal science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maizbha U AhmedDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Tony VelkovDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Yu-Wei LinFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Bo YunDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Cameron J NowellDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Fanfan ZhouFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Qi Tony ZhouDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Kim ChanFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Mohammad A K AzadMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia Mohammad.Azad@monash.edu Jian.Li@monash.edu.
Jian LiMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia Mohammad.Azad@monash.edu Jian.Li@monash.edu.
Monash University · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

New Tricks for 'Old' Drugs: PK/PD of Polymyxin Nonantibiotic CombinationsR01AI111965 · NIAID · MONASH UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhaled polymyxins are of considerable utility in achieving optimal exposure in the respiratory tract for the treatment of lung infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Current inhaled polymyxin therapy is empirical, and often large doses are used that may lead to potential pulmonary adverse effects. This study aimed to investigate the effect of polymyxins on human lung epithelial (A549) cells. The viability of A549 cells was examined after treatment with polymyxins by flow cytometry. Activation of caspases 3, 8, and 9, expression of Fas ligand (FasL), loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial oxidative stress induced by polymyxin B were evaluated. The concentration of polymyxin B required to induce 50% of maximal cell death was 1.74 mM (95% confidence interval, 1.60 to 1.90 mM). Colistin was at least 2-fold less toxic than polymyxin B, while colistimethate was nontoxic. With 2.0 mM polymyxin B, 30.6% ± 11.5% (mean ± standard deviation) of the cells were apoptotic at 8 h and this increased to 71.3% ± 3.72% at 24 h. Concentration- and time-dependent activation of caspases 3, 8, and 9 was evident, while the activation of caspase 9 was more dramatic. Furthermore, polymyxin B caused concentration- and time-dependent FasL expression, production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, and changes in mitochondrial membrane potential. This is the first study to demonstrate that both extrinsic death receptor and intrinsic mitochondrial pathways are involved in polymyxin-induced toxicity in A549 cells. This knowledge base is critical for the development of novel strategies for the safe and effective inhalation therapy of polymyxins against Gram-negative "superbugs."

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsApoptosisCell LineColistinHumansMembrane Potential, MitochondrialMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMitochondriaPolymyxin BPolymyxinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistincolistinmethanesulfonic acidPolymyxin BPolymyxinsapoptosismitochondriapolymyxinpulmonary deliveryrespiratory toxicity

Identifiers

PMID28416543
PMCPMC5444173
OpenAlexW2607217081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.