Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28416539›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Comparison of EUCAST and CLSI Reference Microdilution MICs of Eight Antifungal Compounds for Candida auris and Associated Tentative Epidemiological Cutoff Values.

M C Arendrup, Anupam Prakash, Joseph Meletiadis, Cheshta Sharma, Anuradha Chowdhary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Functional Characterization ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Acquired amphotericin B resistance attributed to a mutatedAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  20. Bad to the bone:ASM case reports · 2025
    Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M C ArendrupUnit of Mycology, Department of Microbiological Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark maca@ssi.dk.
Anupam PrakashDepartment of Medical Mycology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Joseph MeletiadisClinical Microbiology Laboratory, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Cheshta SharmaDepartment of Medical Mycology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Anuradha ChowdharyDepartment of Medical Mycology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-7462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesCandidaEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafunginMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafunginamphotericin Bantifungal susceptibility testingazolesCandida aurisechinocandinsECOFFin vitroMIC

Identifiers

PMID28416539
PMCPMC5444165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.