Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28416327›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychologia2017

Executive functioning and substance use in adolescence: Neurobiological and behavioral perspectives.

Jungmeen Kim-Spoon, Rachel E Kahn, Nina Lauharatanahirun, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Warren K Bickel, Pearl H Chiu, Brooks King-Casas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural Signatures of Cognitive Control Predict Future Adolescent Substance Use Onset and Frequency.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Childhood executive control and adolescent substance use initiation: the mediating roles of physical and relational aggression and prosocial behavior.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jungmeen Kim-SpoonDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States. Electronic address: jungmeen@vt.edu.
Rachel E KahnSand Ridge Secure Treatment Center, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison, WI, United States.
Nina LauharatanahirunDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States; Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Kirby Deater-DeckardDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Warren K BickelDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States; Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Pearl H ChiuDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States; Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Brooks King-CasasDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States; Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States.

Funding

Neurobehavioral Determinants of Health Risk Behaviors: From Adolescence to Young AdulthoodR01DA036017 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI CASAS, BROOKS, KIM-SPOON, JUNGMEEN · 2013 to 2022
$7.2M
VT Initiative for Maximizing Student DiversityR25GM072767 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SMITH, EDWARD J · 2007 to 2021
$6.9M
Neurobehavioral mechanisms of substance use and protective behaviors in adolescentsF31DA042594 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI LAUHARATANAHIRUN, NINA · 2016 to 2017
$42k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA042594NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036017NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM072767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current review is guided by the theoretical perspective that emphasizes the regulating role of executive functioning (Carver et al., 2009) and presents studies that elucidate the ways that executive functioning (inhibition and working memory) explain individual differences in adolescent substance use independently or by regulating the reactive system (reward and punishment sensitivity). Behavioral studies indicate that main effects of executive functioning on adolescent substance use are often nonsignificant or weak in effect sizes. In contrast, emerging evidence suggests consistent and stronger regulating effects of executive functioning over reward and punishment sensitivity. Functional neuroimaging studies reveal significant associations between executive functioning task-related hemodynamic responses and substance use with strong effect sizes. There is also direct evidence from studies testing statistical interactions of the regulating effects of EF-related brain activation, and indirect evidence in studies examining functional connectivity, temporal discounting, and reinforced control. We note key future directions and ways to address limitations in existing work.

Indexed as

AdolescentCognition DisordersExecutive FunctionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSubstance-Related DisordersCognitive controlExecutive functioningPunishment sensitivityReward sensitivitySubstance use

Identifiers

PMID28416327
PMCPMC5518609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.