Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28416204›Full record

ArticleDisability and health journal2017

"They must understand we are people": Pregnancy and maternity service use among signing Deaf women in Cape Town.

Margaret W Gichane, Marion Heap, Mayara Fontes, Leslie London

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Experiences of Women with Disabilities in Accessing Maternal Healthcare Services: A South African Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Experiences of pregnancy and perinatal healthcare access of women who are deaf: a qualitative study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret W GichaneDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 302 Rosenau Hall, CB #7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. Electronic address: warugich@live.unc.edu.
Marion HeapHealth and Human Rights Programme, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, South Africa.
Mayara FontesHealth and Human Rights Programme, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, South Africa.
Leslie LondonHealth and Human Rights Programme, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

International Exchange Program for Minority StudentsT37MD001452 · NIMHD · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI CLAUDIO, LUZ · 2005 to 2023
$4.9M
NIMHD NIH HHS T37 MD001452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with disabilities are at disproportionate risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, however, there is limited information on their pregnancy histories. This mixed-methods study focuses on signing Deaf women whose access to health care may be compromised by language barriers related to their disability.

objectiveTo describe and compare the pregnancy outcomes and maternity service use of a sample of signing Deaf women of child-bearing age in Cape Town to the population of the Western Cape of South Africa.

methodsWe interviewed 42 Deaf women selected by non-probability snowball sampling, using a structured questionnaire in South African Sign Language in Cape Town in July 2016.

resultsAverage parity of the sample was similar to that of the Western Cape population. Most women had one or two children (74%). Thirty-one percent of women had experienced a miscarriage and 19% had terminated a pregnancy. Almost all women (96%) attended at least one antenatal appointment during their pregnancies, and all deliveries occurred at a health facility. Women primarily relied on writing to communicate during antenatal visits and labor/delivery. The majority of women reported communication issues due to limited interpretation services, and some reported experiencing mistreatment from hospital staff.

conclusionThis study provides novel information on the pregnancy histories of Deaf women. While maternal service usage was high, the quality of services were inadequate with reports of linguistic barriers and mistreatment. Findings suggest the need to improve maternity care for Deaf women through implementing interpretation services and providing sensitivity training to health care providers.

Indexed as

Sign LanguageAdolescentAdultCommunication BarriersFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAccess barriersCommunicationDeafDisabilityMaternityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28416204
PMCPMC5484522
OpenAlexW2605374914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.