Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28415970›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposon and inverted repeat-derived endogenous siRNAs are differentially processed in distinct cellular locations.

Andrew W Harrington, Michael R McKain, Daniel Michalski, Kaylyn M Bauer, Joshua M Daugherty, Mindy Steiniger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew W HarringtonDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA.
Michael R McKainDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 North Warson Road, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA.
Daniel MichalskiDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA.
Kaylyn M BauerDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA.
Joshua M DaughertyDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA.
Mindy SteinigerDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA. steinigerm@umsl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8445-3175
University of Missouri–St. Louis · USDonald Danforth Plant Science Center · US

Funding

The link between mRNA 3' end processing and siRNA biogenesis in DrosophilaR15GM107931 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ST. LOUIS · PI STEINIGER, MINDY · 2013 to 2013
$330k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM107931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndogenous small interfering (esi)RNAs repress mRNA levels and retrotransposon mobility in Drosophila somatic cells by poorly understood mechanisms. 21 nucleotide esiRNAs are primarily generated from retrotransposons and two inverted repeat (hairpin) loci in Drosophila culture cells in a Dicer2 dependent manner. Additionally, proteins involved in 3' end processing, such as Symplekin, CPSF73 and CPSR100, have been recently implicated in the esiRNA pathway.

resultsHere we present evidence of overlap between two essential RNA metabolic pathways: esiRNA biogenesis and mRNA 3' end processing. We have identified a nucleus-specific interaction between the essential esiRNA cleavage enzyme Dicer2 (Dcr2) and Symplekin, a component of the core cleavage complex (CCC) required for 3' end processing of all eukaryotic mRNAs. This interaction is mediated by the N-terminal 271 amino acids of Symplekin; CCC factors CPSF73 and CPSF100 do not contact Dcr2. While Dcr2 binds the CCC, Dcr2 knockdown does not affect mRNA 3' end formation. RNAi-depletion of CCC components Symplekin and CPSF73 causes perturbations in esiRNA abundance that correlate with fluctuations in retrotransposon and hairpin esiRNA precursor levels. We also discovered that esiRNAs generated from retrotransposons and hairpins have distinct physical characteristics including a higher predominance of 22 nucleotide hairpin-derived esiRNAs and differences in 3' and 5' base preference. Additionally, retrotransposon precursors and derived esiRNAs are highly enriched in the nucleus while hairpins and hairpin derived esiRNAs are predominantly cytoplasmic similar to canonical mRNAs. RNAi-depletion of either CPSF73 or Symplekin results in nuclear retention of both hairpin and retrotransposon precursors suggesting that polyadenylation indirectly affects cellular localization of Dcr2 substrates.

conclusionsTogether, these observations support a novel mechanism in which differences in localization of esiRNA precursors impacts esiRNA biogenesis. Hairpin-derived esiRNAs are generated in the cytoplasm independent of Dcr2-Symplekin interactions, while retrotransposons are processed in the nucleus.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicroscopy, FluorescencemRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsRetroelementsRNA InterferenceRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingSequence Analysis, RNA3' Untranslated RegionsDrosophila ProteinsmRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsRetroelementsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingSym protein, DrosophilaCore cleavage complexCPSF73Dicer2Endogenous small interfering RNA biogenesismRNA 3’ end processingSymplekin

Identifiers

PMID28415970
PMCPMC5392987
OpenAlexW2606781898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.