Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28415793›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Clinical framework for next generation sequencing based analysis of treatment predictive mutations and multiplexed gene fusion detection in non-small cell lung cancer.

Kajsa Ericson Lindquist, Anna Karlsson, Per Levéen, Hans Brunnström, Christel Reuterswärd, Karolina Holm, Mats Jönsson, Karin Annersten, Frida Rosengren, Karin Jirström and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Guidelines for clinical practice ofJournal of the National Cancer Center · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Simultaneous analysis ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kajsa Ericson LindquistDepartment of Pathology, Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund SE 22185, Sweden.
Anna KarlssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Per LevéenDepartment of Pathology, Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund SE 22185, Sweden.
Hans BrunnströmDepartment of Pathology, Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund SE 22185, Sweden.
Christel ReuterswärdDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Karolina HolmDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Mats JönssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Karin AnnerstenDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Frida RosengrenDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Karin JirströmDepartment of Pathology, Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund SE 22185, Sweden.
Jaroslaw KosieradzkiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Skane University Hospital, Lund SE22185, Sweden.
Lars EkDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Skane University Hospital, Lund SE22185, Sweden.
Åke BorgDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Maria PlanckDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Göran JönssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Johan StaafDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund SE 22381, Sweden.
Lund University · SEMedicon Village · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine requires accurate multi-gene clinical diagnostics. We describe the implementation of an Illumina TruSight Tumor (TST) clinical NGS diagnostic framework and parallel validation of a NanoString RNA-based ALK, RET, and ROS1 gene fusion assay for combined analysis of treatment predictive alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a regional healthcare region of Sweden (Scandinavia). The TST panel was clinically validated in 81 tumors (99% hotspot mutation concordance), after which 533 consecutive NSCLCs were collected during one-year of routine clinical analysis in the healthcare region (~90% advanced stage patients). The NanoString assay was evaluated in 169 of 533 cases. In the 533-sample cohort 79% had 1-2 variants, 12% >2 variants and 9% no detected variants. Ten gene fusions (five ALK, three RET, two ROS1) were detected in 135 successfully analyzed cases (80% analysis success rate). No ALK or ROS1 FISH fusion positive case was missed by the NanoString assay. Stratification of the 533-sample cohort based on actionable alterations in 11 oncogenes revealed that 66% of adenocarcinomas, 13% of squamous carcinoma (SqCC) and 56% of NSCLC not otherwise specified harbored ≥1 alteration. In adenocarcinoma, 10.6% of patients (50.3% if including KRAS) could potentially be eligible for emerging therapeutics, in addition to the 15.3% of patients eligible for standard EGFR or ALK inhibitors. For squamous carcinoma corresponding proportions were 4.4% (11.1% with KRAS) vs 2.2%. In conclusion, multiplexed NGS and gene fusion analyses are feasible in NSCLC for clinical diagnostics, identifying notable proportions of patients potentially eligible for emerging molecular therapeutics.

Indexed as

MutationAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleOncogene Proteins, FusionPrecision MedicineProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesSequence Analysis, DNAALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseOncogene Proteins, FusionProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesRET protein, humanROS1 protein, humangene fusionlung cancermutationNGSprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID28415793
PMCPMC5471012
OpenAlexW2596372264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.