Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28415745›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2017

Comparative study of cisplatin-based definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 versus paclitaxel for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Min Fang, Tao Song, Xiaodong Liang, Shiliang Lv, Jianbo Li, Hong'en Xu, Limin Luo, Yongshi Jia

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min FangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Tao SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Xiaodong LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Shiliang LvDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Jianbo LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ningbo Mingzhou Hospital, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Hong'en XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Limin LuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Yongshi JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CNNingbo No. 2 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the efficiency and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin (TP) versus S-1 plus Cisplatin (CS) in unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC). Between January 2009 and December 2013, 203 LAESCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. We performed a propensity score matching analysis; 41 patients treated with the CS regimen were matched 1:1 to patients who received the TP regimen. Patient- and disease-related characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The CS group showed significantly better treatment compliance (90.2% vs. 70.7%, P = 0.026) and less hospital stay (48 days vs 49 days, P = 0.025) over the TP group during the CCRT course. The complete response rate was comparable between the two groups (51.2% vs. 48.8%, P = 0.825). The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in the TP group were 63.4% and 32.4% compared to 62.8% and 32.1% in the CS group, respectively (P = 0.796). The 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the TP group were 51.2% and 24.9%, compared to 53.6% and 18.9% in the CS group, respectively (P = 0.630). The incidence of severe and total neutropenia in the TP group was significantly higher compared to the CS group (P = 0.011 and 0.046, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that T stage and the complete response rate were strong prognostic factors associated with OS and PFS. In conclusion, both treatment regimens yielded satisfactory survival outcomes, but the CS regimen could significantly improve treatment compliance, reduce hematological toxicities and lengths of hospital stay. Future prospective studies in large cohorts are highly warranted to confirm the findings in our report.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDrug CombinationsEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaNeutropeniaOxonic AcidPaclitaxelCisplatinDrug CombinationsFluorouracilOxonic AcidPaclitaxelS 1 (combination)Tegafurcisplatindefinitive concourrent chemoradiotherapyesophageal squamous cell carcinomapaclitaxelS-1

Identifiers

PMID28415745
PMCPMC5514892
OpenAlexW2598194054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.