Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28415659›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Poor prognosis of hexokinase 2 overexpression in solid tumors of digestive system: a meta-analysis.

Jiayuan Wu, Liren Hu, Fenping Wu, Lei Zou, Taiping He

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The regulatory roles and clinical significance of glycolysis in tumor.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  15. Targeting the Warburg Effect in Cancer: Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiayuan WuClinical Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, People's Republic of China.
Liren HuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, People's Republic of China.
Fenping WuDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Seventh People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Oncology Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Lei ZouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Taiping HeSchool of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, People's Republic of China.
Guangdong Medical College · CNChengdu Second People's Hospital · CNFirst People's Hospital of Yunnan Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several previous studies have reported the prognostic value of hexokinase 2 (HK2) in digestive system tumors. However, these studies were limited by the small sample sizes and the results were inconsistent among them. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis based on 15 studies with 1932 patients to assess the relationship between HK2 overexpression and overall survival (OS) of digestive system malignancies. The relationship of HK2 and clinicopathological features was also evaluated. Hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the effect size. Positive HK2 expression showed poor OS in all tumor types (HR = 1.75 [1.41-2.18], P < 0.001). When stratified by tumor type, the impact of HK2 overexpression on poor prognosis was observed in gastric cancer (HR = 1.77 [1.25-2.50], P < 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 1.87 [1.58-2.21], P < 0.001), and colorectal cancer (HR = 2.89 [1.62-5.15], P < 0.001), but not in pancreatic ductal adencarcinoma (HR = 1.11 [0.58-2.11], P = 0.763). Furthermore, high HK2 expression was significantly associated with some phenotypes of tumor aggressiveness, such as large tumor size (OR = 2.03 [1.10-3.74], P = 0.024), positive lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.05 [1.39-3.02], P < 0.001), advanced clinical stage (OR = 2.17 [1.21-3.89], P = 0.009) and high alpha fetoprotein level (OR = 1.47 [1.09-2.02] P = 0.013). In summary, HK2 might act as a prognostic indicator and a potential therapeutic target of these digestive system cancers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene ExpressionAnimalsDigestive System NeoplasmsHexokinaseHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPrognosisPublication BiasTumor BurdenBiomarkers, TumorHexokinasedigestive systemhexokinase 2meta-analysisprognosissolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID28415659
PMCPMC5458288
OpenAlexW2591601567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.