Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28415633›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2017

A phase 2 study of vorinostat in locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Priscila H Goncalves, Lance K Heilbrun, Michael T Barrett, Shivaani Kummar, Aaron R Hansen, Lillian L Siu, Richard L Piekarz, Ammar W Sukari, Joseph Chao, Mary Jo Pilat and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emerging role of MYB transcription factors in cancer drug resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Therapeutic Landscape of Salivary Gland Malignancies-Where Are We Now?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Priscila H GoncalvesKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Lance K HeilbrunKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Michael T BarrettMayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Shivaani KummarDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Aaron R HansenDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lillian L SiuDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Richard L PiekarzDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ammar W SukariKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Joseph ChaoDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Mary Jo PilatKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Daryn W SmithKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Lindsay CasettaKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Scott A BoernerKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Alice ChenDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Elizabeth LenkiewiczMayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Smriti MalasiMayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Patricia M LoRussoKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USWayne State University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNational Cancer Institute · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CACity of Hope · USStanford University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
ViKTriY-PC Consortium Phase II SupplementUM1CA186689 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Patricia M. LoRusso · 2014 to 2026
$22.2M
Phase I Molecular and Clinical Pharmacodynamic Trials ETCTNUM1CA186717 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI A. Dimitrios Colevas, Alexey V. Danilov · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
PHASE I TRIALS OF NEW ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA062487 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LORUSSO, PATRICIA M. · 1994 to 2013
$8.4M
Princess Margaret Hospital Phase I ConsortiumU01CA132123 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI SIU, LILLIAN L · 2008 to 2013
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS U01 CA062487NCI NIH HHS U01 CA132123NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186689NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVorinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi). Based on a confirmed partial response (PR) in an adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) patient treated with vorinostat in a prior phase 1 trial, we initiated this phase 2 trial.

methodsVorinostat was administered orally 400 mg daily, 28 day cycles. The primary objective was to evaluate response rate (RR). Exploratory studies included whole exome sequencing (WES) of selected patients.

resultsThirty patients were enrolled. Median age of patients was 53 years (range 21-73). Median number of cycles was 5 (range 1-66). Lymphopenia (n = 5), hypertension (n = 3), oral pain (n = 2), thromboembolic events (n = 2) and fatigue (n = 2) were the only grade 3 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in more than 1 patient. Eleven patients were dose reduced secondary to drug-related AEs. Two patients had a partial response (PR), with response durations of 53 and 7.2 months. One patient had a minor response with a decrease in ascites (for 19 cycles). Stable disease was the best response in 27 patients. Targeted and WES of 8 patients in this trial identified mutations in chromatin remodeling genes highlighting the role of the epigenome in ACC.

conclusionVorinostat demonstrated efficacy in patients with ACC supporting the inclusion of HDACi in future studies to treat ACC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Adenoid CysticChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyExome SequencingFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPharmacogenomic VariantsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsVorinostatadenoid cysticSAHAsalivary gland tumorsuberoylanilide hydroxamic acidvorinostat

Identifiers

PMID28415633
PMCPMC5464838
OpenAlexW2601984321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.