ArticlePloS one2017
DNA barcoding evaluation and implications for phylogenetic relationships in Lauraceae from China.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Variation and Phylogenetic Analysis of Indonesian Sugarcane (Tropical life sciences research · 2026Article
- Limited resolution of DNA barcodes and environmental influence on phytochemical diversity in Berberis integerrima (Berberidaceae).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High species discrimination inPlant diversity · 2025Article
- DNA Barcoding Provides Taxonomic Clues for Identifying Five EndangeredPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A DNA barcode reference library of native seed plants in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Plastome structure, evolution and diversity of Frankincense-producing Boswellia genus.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Global advances in phylogeny, taxonomy and biogeography of Lauraceae.Plant diversity · 2025Review
- Plastome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Two new species ofPhytoKeys · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genome of Cinnamomum daphnoides (Lauraceae), An Endangered Island Endemic Plant.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Article
- Exploring DNA barcode for accurate identification of threatened Aconitum L. species from Western Himalaya.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- A DNA barcode reference library for CITES listed MalagasyEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Essential Oil Chemotypes and Genetic Variability ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Endorsement and phylogenetic analysis of some Fabaceae plants based on DNA barcoding.Molecular biology reports · 2022Article
- DNA Barcoding and Phylogenomic Analysis of the GenusFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Review
- Essential Oil Composition and DNA Barcode and Identification ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021Article
- Universal barcoding regions, rbcL, matK and trnH-psbA do not discriminate Cinnamomum species in Sri Lanka.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lauraceae are an important component of tropical and subtropical forests and have major ecological and economic significance. Owing to lack of clear-cut morphological differences between genera and species, this family is an ideal case for testing the efficacy of DNA barcoding in the identification and discrimination of species and genera. In this study, we evaluated five widely recommended plant DNA barcode loci matK, rbcL, trnH-psbA, ITS2 and the entire ITS region for 409 individuals representing 133 species, 12 genera from China. We tested the ability of DNA barcoding to distinguish species and as an alternative tool for correcting species misidentification. We also used the rbcL+matK+trnH-psbA+ITS loci to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of the species examined. Among the gene regions and their combinations, ITS was the most efficient for identifying species (57.5%) and genera (70%). DNA barcoding also had a positive role for correcting species misidentification (10.8%). Furthermore, based on the results of the phylogenetic analyses, Chinese Lauraceae species formed three supported monophyletic clades, with the Cryptocarya group strongly supported (PP = 1.00, BS = 100%) and the clade including the Persea group, Laureae and Cinnamomum also receiving strong support (PP = 1.00, BS = 98%), whereas the Caryodaphnopsis-Neocinnamomum received only moderate support (PP = 1.00 and BS = 85%). This study indicates that molecular barcoding can assist in screening difficult to identify families like Lauraceae, detecting errors of species identification, as well as helping to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships. DNA barcoding can thus help with large-scale biodiversity inventories and rare species conservation by improving accuracy, as well as reducing time and costs associated with species identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.