Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28414475›Full record

ArticlePsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2017

Cognitive functioning of adolescent and young adult cannabis users in the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort.

J Cobb Scott, Daniel H Wolf, Monica E Calkins, Emily C Bach, Jennifer Weidner, Kosha Ruparel, Tyler M Moore, Jason D Jones, Chad T Jackson, Raquel E Gur and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J Cobb ScottDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6538-9043
Daniel H WolfDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Monica E CalkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Emily C BachDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Jennifer WeidnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Kosha RuparelDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Tyler M MooreDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Jason D JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Chad T JacksonDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Raquel E GurDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Ruben C GurDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Neurodevelopmental Genomics: Trajectories of Complex PhenotypesRC2MH089983 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RAQUEL E · 2009 to 2011
$14.3M
2/2 Neurodevelopmental Genomics: Trajectories of Complex PhenotypesRC2MH089924 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI HAKONARSON, HAKON · 2009 to 2011
$10.7M
NMDA Receptor Hypofunction in the Amygdala of Schizophrenia PatientsP50MH096891 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BILKER, WARREN B. · 2012 to 2016
$10.6M
SCHIZOPHRENIA: A NEUROPSYCHIATRIC PERSPECTIVET32MH019112 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RAQUEL E · 1990 to 2024
$6.2M
A Prospective Study of Endophenotypes in At-Risk Youths and Their SiblingsK08MH079364 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CALKINS, MONICA E · 2007 to 2011
$750k
Neural Response to Cognitive Overload in Posttraumatic Stress DisorderIK2CX000772 · VA · VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI SCOTT, JAMES COBB · 2012 to 2016
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX000772NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201400053CNIMH NIH HHS K08 MH079364NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH096891NIMH NIH HHS RC2 MH089924NIMH NIH HHS RC2 MH089983NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis use in youth is rising and has been linked to deficits in cognitive functioning. However, cognitive findings have primarily been based on small samples of users seeking treatment, and few studies have evaluated cognition in occasional cannabis users. Here, we examined 4,568 adolescents and young adults (ages 14-21 years) drawn from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, a prospective, population-based study. Participants were classified as cannabis Non-Users (n = 3,401), Occasional Users (twice per week or less; n = 940), or Frequent Users (>3 times per week; n = 227). Mixed-model analyses examined main effects of cannabis use and interactions between age and cannabis use on cognitive functioning. There was a significant interaction between cannabis group and age such that adolescent (but not young adult) Frequent Users performed worse than Non-Users on measures of executive control (p = .002). Earlier age of cannabis use was associated with worse performance in executive control in Occasional Users (p = .04). Unexpectedly, Occasional Users exhibited better executive control, memory, and social cognition than Non-Users (ps < .05). Although mild executive control deficits in adolescent frequent users and a relation between early cannabis initiation and cognitive performance are partially consistent with prior research, cognitive deficits were not found in other hypothesized domains in this community-based sample. Moreover, occasional cannabis users displayed equivalent or even slightly better executive control, social-cognitive, and memory abilities compared with nonusers, suggesting complex relationships between cannabis use and cognition in youth. Longitudinal studies with community samples are needed to identify variables affecting risk and resilience to cognitive deficits associated with cannabis. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAdolescentCannabisCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingMemoryNeuropsychological TestsPhiladelphiaProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28414475
PMCPMC5468477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.