Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28413997›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2017

Differences in meal patterns and timing with regard to central obesity in the ANIBES ('Anthropometric data, macronutrients and micronutrients intake, practice of physical activity, socioeconomic data and lifestyles in Spain') Study.

Aránzazu Aparicio, Elena E Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Javier Aranceta-Bartrina, Ángel Gil, Marcela González-Gross, Lluis Serra-Majem, Gregorio Varela-Moreiras, Rosa Maria Ortega

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aránzazu Aparicio1VALORNUT Research Group,Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy,Complutense University of Madrid,Plaza Ramón y Cajal s/n,28040 Madrid,Spain.
Elena E Rodríguez-Rodríguez1VALORNUT Research Group,Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy,Complutense University of Madrid,Plaza Ramón y Cajal s/n,28040 Madrid,Spain.
Javier Aranceta-Bartrina2CIBER OBN,Biomedical Research Networking Center for Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition,Carlos III Health Institute,Madrid,Spain.
Ángel Gil2CIBER OBN,Biomedical Research Networking Center for Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition,Carlos III Health Institute,Madrid,Spain.
Marcela González-Gross2CIBER OBN,Biomedical Research Networking Center for Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition,Carlos III Health Institute,Madrid,Spain.
Lluis Serra-Majem2CIBER OBN,Biomedical Research Networking Center for Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition,Carlos III Health Institute,Madrid,Spain.
Gregorio Varela-Moreiras7Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy,CEU San Pablo University,Madrid,Spain.
Rosa Maria Ortega1VALORNUT Research Group,Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy,Complutense University of Madrid,Plaza Ramón y Cajal s/n,28040 Madrid,Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the association of meal patterns and timing with central obesity to identify the best dietary strategies to deal with the increasing obesity prevalence.

designA cross-sectional study performed on data from a representative sample of the Spanish population. Height and waist circumference were measured using standardized procedures and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was calculated. The sample was divided into those without central obesity (WHtR<0·5) and those with central obesity (WHtR≥0·5).

settingANIBES ('Anthropometric data, macronutrients and micronutrients intake, practice of physical activity, socioeconomic data and lifestyles in Spain') Study. SUBJECTS: Adults aged 18-64 years (n 1655; 798 men and 857 women).

resultsA higher percentage of people ate more than four meals daily in the group without central obesity and those with central obesity more frequently skipped the mid-afternoon snack than those without. Breakfasts containing >25 % of total energy intake and lunches containing >35 % of total energy intake were associated with increased likelihood of central obesity (OR=1·874, 95 % CI 1·019, 3·448; P15 % of total energy were associated with decreased likelihood of central obesity (OR=0·477, 95 % CI 0·313, 0·727; P<0·001 and OR=0·650, 95 % CI 0·453, 0·932; P<0·05, respectively). The variety of cereals, wholegrain cereals and dairy was higher in the population without central obesity.

conclusionsOur results suggest that 'what and when we eat' should be considered dietary strategies to reduce central obesity.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFeeding BehaviorHealth TransitionMealsSnacksAdolescentAdultAgedChildCross-Sectional StudiesDietExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleCentral obesityObesityTimingVarietyWaist-to-height ratio

Identifiers

PMID28413997
PMCPMC5582404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.