Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28413718›Full record

ReviewCurrent emergency and hospital medicine reports2017

Best Practices for Medication Utilization Evaluations in Postsurgical Pain Management.

Brian Faley, John Fanikos

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current emergency and hospital medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian FaleyDepartment of Pharmacy, Hackensack University Medical Center, 30 Prospect Ave., Hackensack, NJ 07601 USA.
John FanikosDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHackensack University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this review is to provide guidance that aids in the practical design, implementation, and analysis of medication use evaluations (MUEs) for postsurgical pain management. SUMMARY: Clinicians have long employed drug use evaluations or drug utilization reviews to ensure the safe and appropriate use of medications in a hospital, medical practice, or other healthcare setting. Although these approaches are valuable, there is a growing trend toward replacing these methods with the MUE, a performance improvement tool that focuses on assessing and improving medication use processes or medication treatment response with the goal of optimizing patient outcomes. Utilizing MUEs to assess patient outcomes and quality of life can be challenging in certain therapeutic areas such as pain management, where measurements of pain can be quantitative but are inherently subjective. Currently, there is little guidance on the development of MUEs that balance subjective and objective outcomes.

conclusionMUEs continue to become the standard for quality improvement for optimizing care and ensuring optimal outcomes. This review of the literature provides guidance in post-surgical pain management, an area that requires measurement of both subjective and objective outcomes.

Indexed as

Drug use evaluationMedication use evaluationPostsurgical painSurgery

Identifiers

PMID28413718
PMCPMC5375963
OpenAlexW2560102864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.