ReviewF1000Research2017
The rise of photoresponsive protein technologies applications
Review in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diving into the zebrafish brain: exploring neuroscience frontiers with genetic tools, imaging techniques, and behavioral insights.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024Review
- Optogenetic Signaling Activation in Zebrafish Embryos.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023Article
- Genetics and pathophysiology of mitral valve prolapse.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Low intensity near-infrared light promotes bone regeneration via circadian clock protein cryptochrome 1.International journal of oral science · 2022Article
- Review
- Blood Flow Forces in Shaping the Vascular System: A Focus on Endothelial Cell Behavior.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Following Endocardial Tissue Movements via Cell Photoconversion in the Zebrafish Embryo.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Anisotropic shear stress patterns predict the orientation of convergent tissue movements in the embryonic heart.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The zebrafish (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.