Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28413609›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2016

An ensemble-based Cox proportional hazards regression framework for predicting survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.

Richard Meier, Stefan Graw, Joseph Usset, Rama Raghavan, Junqiang Dai, Prabhakar Chalise, Shellie Ellis, Brooke Fridley, Devin Koestler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard Meier *Department of Biostatistic, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Stefan Graw *Department of Biostatistic, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Joseph UssetDepartment of Biostatistic, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Rama RaghavanDepartment of Biostatistic, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Junqiang DaiDepartment of Biostatistic, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Prabhakar ChaliseDepartment of Biostatistic, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Shellie EllisDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Brooke FridleyDepartment of Biostatistic, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Devin KoestlerDepartment of Biostatistic, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From March through August 2015, nearly 60 teams from around the world participated in the Prostate Cancer Dream Challenge (PCDC). Participating teams were faced with the task of developing prediction models for patient survival and treatment discontinuation using baseline clinical variables collected on metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients in the comparator arm of four phase III clinical trials. In total, over 2,000 mCRPC patients treated with first-line docetaxel comprised the training and testing data sets used in this challenge. In this paper we describe: (a) the sub-challenges comprising the PCDC, (b) the statistical metrics used to benchmark prediction performance, (c) our analytical approach, and finally (d) our team's overall performance in this challenge. Specifically, we discuss our curated, ad-hoc, feature selection (CAFS) strategy for identifying clinically important risk-predictors, the ensemble-based Cox proportional hazards regression framework used in our final submission, and the adaptation of our modeling framework based on the results from the intermittent leaderboard rounds. Strong predictors of patient survival were successfully identified utilizing our model building approach. Several of the identified predictors were new features created by our team via strategically merging collections of weak predictors. In each of the three intermittent leaderboard rounds, our prediction models scored among the top four models across all participating teams and our final submission ranked 9

Indexed as

DREAM challengeEnsemble-based modelingmCRPCprostate cancersurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID28413609
PMCPMC5365222
OpenAlexW2550753637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.