ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Efficacy of arsenic trioxide drug-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary heart disease.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Levels of leachable elements from long-term use of enFlow fluid warmer.SAGE open medicine · 2022Article
- miR-22 Is a Novel Mediator of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Modulation and Neointima Formation.Circulation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of arsenic trioxide drug-eluting (AVI) stents, manufactured in China, for the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). Between January and August 2014, 40 patients with CHD admitted to Yongchuan Hospital with implanted AVI stents alone were selected. A one-year clinical follow-up was completed and one year postoperative coronary angiography was reviewed. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), recurrent angina, stent restenosis and stent thrombosis cases were detected. All 40 patients with CHD completed the one-year clinical follow-up, as well as the one-year postoperative coronary angiography. The follow-up results indicated that the MACE rate was 15.0% (6/40), the target lesion revascularization rate was 15.0% (6/40), the angina recurrence rate was 32.5% (13/40), the in-stent restenosis rate was 20.0% (8/40) and the stent thrombosis rate was zero. There were no cases of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The incidence of restenosis was higher following implantation of the AVI stent and the safety and clinical efficacy were worse than expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.