Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28413375›Full record

ArticleCurrent immunology reviews2015

Inflammatory Cyclooxygenase Activity and PGE

Jenny U Johansson, Nathaniel S Woodling, Ju Shi, Katrin I Andreasson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current immunology reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Role of PGE2 in Age-related Diseases.Current drug targets · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biomolecules · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Epigenetics of chronic inflammatory diseases.Journal of inflammation research · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jenny U JohanssonDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nathaniel S WoodlingDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ju ShiDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Katrin I AndreassonDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBSRI International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inflammatory response is a fundamental driving force in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the setting of accumulating immunogenic Aß peptide assemblies, microglia, the innate immune cells of the brain, generate a non-resolving immune response and fail to adequately clear accumulating Aß peptides, accelerating neuronal and synaptic injury. Pathological, biomarker, and imaging studies point to a prominent role of the innate immune response in AD development, and the molecular components of this response are beginning to be unraveled. The inflammatory cyclooxygenase-PGE

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid betacyclooxgenasesEP2 receptorEP3 receptorEP4 receptorinflammationmicrogliaprostaglandin E2

Identifiers

PMID28413375
PMCPMC5384338
OpenAlexW2760164532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.