Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28413363›Full record

ArticleCurrent colorectal cancer reports2017

Wnt Signaling and Colorectal Cancer.

Emma M Schatoff, Benjamin I Leach, Lukas E Dow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current colorectal cancer reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Association ofGenetics research · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Homer condensates orchestrate YAP-Wnt signaling crosstalk downstream of the Crumbs polarity complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma M SchatoffSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, 10021.
Benjamin I LeachSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, 10021.
Lukas E DowSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, 10021.

Funding

Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering MST ProgramT32GM007739 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HSU, KATHARINE C · 1985 to 2023
$51.1M
A scalable platform for target validation in GEMM models of gastrointestinal malignancies.R01CA195787 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LOWE, SCOTT W. · 2015 to 2017
$2.0M
Defining the genetic requirements for maintenance of colorectal cancerK22CA181280 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI DOW, LUKAS EDWARD · 2014 to 2016
$584k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA181280NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195787NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WNT signaling pathway is a critical mediator of tissue homeostasis and repair, and frequently co-opted during tumor development. Almost all colorectal cancers (CRC) demonstrate hyperactivation of the WNT pathway, which in many cases is believed to be the initiating and driving event. In this short review, we provide a focused overview of recent developments in our understanding of the WNT pathway in CRC, describe new research tools that are enabling a deeper understanding of WNT biology, and outline ongoing efforts to target this pathway therapeutically.

Indexed as

APCbeta-catenincolorectal cancerCRCRSPOWnt

Identifiers

PMID28413363
PMCPMC5391049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.