ReviewProceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2017
Resistive-pulse and rectification sensing with glass and carbon nanopipettes.
Review in Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Applications of Nanopore Technology in Tumor Screening: An Exosome-Centric Approach.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Modeling Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy (SECCM) in Twisted Bilayer Graphene.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024Article
- An Insulin-Modified pH-Responsive Nanopipette Based on Ion Current Rectification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Low-cost and convenient fabrication of polymer micro/nanopores with the needle punching process and their applications in nanofluidic sensing.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- Article
- Ion Current Rectification and Long-Range Interference in Conical Silicon Micropores.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Article
- Quantification of the charge transport processes inside carbon nanopipettes.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Thin layer cell behavior of CNT yarn and cavity carbon nanopipette electrodes: Effect on catecholamine detection.Electrochimica acta · 2020Article
- Microfluidic devices for the detection of viruses: aspects of emergency fabrication during the COVID-19 pandemic and other outbreaks.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020Review
- Rational design of DNA nanostructures for single molecule biosensing.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Review-Recent Advances in Nanosensors Built with Pre-Pulled Glass Nanopipettes and Their Applications in Chemical and Biological Sensing.Journal of the Electrochemical Society · 2020Article
- Single molecule sensing of amyloid-β aggregation by confined glass nanopores.Chemical science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Along with more prevalent solid-state nanopores, glass or quartz nanopipettes have found applications in resistive-pulse and rectification sensing. Their advantages include the ease of fabrication, small physical size and needle-like geometry, rendering them useful for local measurements in small spaces and delivery of nanoparticles/biomolecules. Carbon nanopipettes fabricated by depositing a thin carbon layer on the inner wall of a quartz pipette provide additional means for detecting electroactive species and fine-tuning the current rectification properties. In this paper, we discuss the fundamentals of resistive-pulse sensing with nanopipettes and our recent studies of current rectification in carbon pipettes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.