Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28413268›Full record

ReviewJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Novel propofol derivatives and implications for anesthesia practice.

Aiden Y Feng, Alan D Kaye, Rachel J Kaye, Kumar Belani, Richard D Urman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06566326 (Oropharyngeoesophageal Topical Anesthesia Prototype Device Versus Intravenous), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06566326 nacompletednot on this map

Oropharyngeoesophageal Topical Anesthesia Prototype Device Versus Intravenous (Propofol - Ketamine Sedation) for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorZagazig UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsUpper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Topical Anesthesia, Intravenous SedationArmsPropofol and ketamine, Modified Oropharyngeo-esophygeal Topical Anesthesia by OPETA Prototype tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. ADMET & DMPK · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Allosteric GABAMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Propofol inhibits prokaryotic voltage-gated NaThe Journal of general physiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aiden Y FengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Rachel J KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Kumar BelaniDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Richard D UrmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is the most commonly used intravenous agent for induction of anesthesia. It is also used for maintenance of anesthesia and sedation in both Intensive Care Units and outpatient procedural settings. Its success in the clinical setting has been a result of its rapid onset, short duration of action, and minimal side effects despite disadvantages associated with its oil emulsion formulation. Early attempts to alter the standard emulsion or to develop new formulations with cyclodextrins and micelles to resolve issues with pain upon injection, the need for antimicrobial agents, and possible hyperlipidemia have mostly failed. With these challenges in the foreground, attention has now shifted to the use of more prodrugs and exogenous alternatives, the success of which is yet to be determined. These new agents must offer significant clinical advantages over the well-entrenched, generic propofol oil emulsion to justify higher costs and to be well received in the increasingly cost-conscious healthcare marketplace.

Indexed as

AlphaxaloneAZD-3043cyclodextrinemulsionfospropofolHX0507HX0969winductionmicellePF0713prodrugpropofol

Identifiers

PMID28413268
PMCPMC5374837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.