Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28413220›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association2017

The physical and psychological impact of neurogenic claudication: the patients' perspectives.

Carlo Ammendolia, Michael Schneider, Kelly Williams, Susan Zickmund, Megan Hamm, Kent Stuber, Christy Tomkins-Lane, Y Raja Rampersaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Danish national clinical guidelines for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carlo AmmendoliaUniversity of Toronto, Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine.
Michael SchneiderUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Physical Therapy and Clinical and Translational Science Institute.
Kelly WilliamsUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health.
Susan ZickmundInformatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS 2.0), Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, 2C21 Building 2, Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT.
Megan HammUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care.
Kent StuberCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Division of Graduate Education & Research.
Christy Tomkins-LaneMount Royal University, Department of Health and Physical Education.
Y Raja RampersaudUniversity of Toronto, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Health Network-Arthritis Program.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe patient perspective regarding the impact of neurogenic claudication (NC) has not been well studied. The objectives of this study were to determine what is most bothersome among patients with NC and how it impacts their lives and expectations with surgical and non-surgical treatment.

methodsSemi-structured telephone interviews were conducted, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis categorized key findings based on relative importance and impact on participants.

resultsTwenty-eight individuals participated in this study. Participants were most bothered by the pain of NC, which dramatically impacted their lives. Inability to walk was the dominant functional limitation and this impacted the ability to engage in recreational and social activities. The most surprising finding was how frequently participants reported significant emotional effects of NC.

conclusionsFrom a patients' perspective NC has a significant multidimensional effects with pain, limited walking ability and emotional effects being most impactful to their lives.

Indexed as

chiropracticneurogenic claudicationoutcome measurementqualitative researchspinal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID28413220
PMCPMC5381486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.