Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28411681›Full record

ReviewRadiologic clinics of North America2017

Breast PET/MR Imaging.

Amy Melsaether, Linda Moy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologic clinics of North America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A multiparametric [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy MelsaetherDepartment of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 160 East 34th Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: amy.melsaether@nyumc.org.
Linda MoyDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI(2)R), New York University School of Medicine, 160 East 34th Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Christopher M Collins · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast and whole-body PET/MR imaging is being used to detect local and metastatic disease and is being investigated for potential imaging biomarkers, which may eventually help personalize treatments and prognoses. This article provides an overview of breast and whole-body PET/MR exam techniques, summarizes PET and MR breast imaging for lesion detection, outlines investigations into multi-parametric breast PET/MR, looks at breast PET/MR in the setting of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and reviews the pros and cons of whole-body PET/MR in the setting of metastatic or suspected metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyBreast cancerBreast MR imagingBreast PETBreast PET/MR imagingMultiparametricPET/MR imagingWhole-body PET/MR imaging

Identifiers

PMID28411681
PMCPMC6080619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.