Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28411409›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2017

Dynamic imaging of AMPA receptor trafficking in vitro and in vivo.

Richard H Roth, Yong Zhang, Richard L Huganir

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Roles of DGKs in neurons: Postsynaptic functions?Advances in biological regulation · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The STEPProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Linking Nanoscale Dynamics of AMPA Receptor Organization to Plasticity of Excitatory Synapses and Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard H RothSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Yong ZhangNeuroscience Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education/National Health and Family Planning Commission, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China. PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Richard L HuganirSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: rhuganir@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Health and Family Planning Commission · CN

Funding

Semaphorin Signaling and Plasticity at the Excitatory SynapseP50MH100024 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUGANIR, RICHARD L · 2013 to 2017
$9.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH100024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulation of synaptic strength through trafficking of AMPA receptors is a fundamental mechanism underlying synaptic plasticity and has been shown to be an important process in higher brain functions such as learning and memory. Many studies have used live time-lapse imaging of fluorescently tagged AMPA receptors to directly monitor their membrane trafficking in the basal state as well as during synaptic plasticity. While most of these studies are performed in vitro using neuronal cell cultures, in the past years technological advances have enabled the imaging of synaptic proteins in vivo in intact organisms. This has allowed for visualization of synaptic plasticity on a molecular level in living and behaving animals. Here, we discuss key studies and approaches using dynamic imaging to visualize AMPA receptor trafficking in vitro as well as imaging synaptic proteins, including AMPA receptors, in vivo.

Indexed as

Intravital MicroscopyOptical ImagingTime-Lapse ImagingAnimalsCells, CulturedFluorescent DyesProtein TransportReceptors, AMPASynapsesFluorescent DyesReceptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID28411409
PMCPMC5554718
OpenAlexW2605535878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.