ReviewMolecular plant pathology2018
Transcriptomics of cereal-Fusarium graminearum interactions: what we have learned so far.
Review in Molecular plant pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of the QTLome of Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Bread Wheat: Refining the Current Puzzle.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Pooled it
- A conserved fungal Egh16-like effector suppresses host defense by disrupting ATP binding of wheat MPK3.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- ZmWRKY29 Transcriptionally Represses ZmRBOHC to Attenuate ROS Production and Facilitates Gibberella Stalk Rot Susceptibility in Maize.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- VDAL enhances wheat resistance to Fusarium graminearum by modulating defense signaling and reducing deoxynivalenol accumulation.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- FHBMarkerDb: unifying genomic markers and functional annotations for durable FHB resistance in major cereals.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- On the Antimicrobial Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- FgNdk1 Promotes Effector Secretion to Scavenge ROS During Fusarium graminearum Infection.Molecular plant pathology · 2025Article
- Molecular dissection of Xinong 511 spike rachis response to Fusarium head blight infection.Stress biology · 2025Article
- Explorations of a novel effector CcAA9-20333 from Colletotrichum coccodes: the potential roles played in host immunity.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Transcription Activator FgDDT Interacts With FgISW1 to Regulate Fungal Development and Pathogenicity in the Global Pathogen Fusarium graminearum.Molecular plant pathology · 2025Article
- Evaluation ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Early changes in microRNA expression in Arabidopsis plants infected with the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum.PloS one · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of two Chinese wheat landraces with contrasting Fusarium head blight resistance reveals miRNA-mediated defense mechanisms.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Early changes in microRNA expression in Arabidopsis plants infected with the fungal pathogenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Potential Involvement ofGenes · 2024Article
- Article
- Identification and functional characterisation of a locus for target site integration in Fusarium graminearum.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Novel EndophyticToxins · 2023Article
- Transcriptional Profiling Reveals the Wheat Defences against Fusarium Head Blight Disease Regulated by a NAC Transcription Factor.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ascomycete fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum causes the globally important Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease on cereal hosts, such as wheat and barley. In addition to reducing grain yield, infection by this pathogen causes major quality losses. In particular, the contamination of food and feed with the F. graminearum trichothecene toxin deoxynivalenol (DON) can have many adverse short- and long-term effects on human and animal health. During the last decade, the interaction between F. graminearum and both cereal and model hosts has been extensively studied through transcriptomic analyses. In this review, we present an overview of how such analyses have advanced our understanding of this economically important plant-microbe interaction. From a host point of view, the transcriptomes of FHB-resistant and FHB-susceptible cereal genotypes, including near-isogenic lines (NILs) that differ by the presence or absence of quantitative trait loci (QTLs), have been studied to understand the mechanisms of disease resistance afforded by such QTLs. Transcriptomic analyses employed to dissect host responses to DON have facilitated the identification of the genes involved in toxin detoxification and disease resistance. From the pathogen point of view, the transcriptome of F. graminearum during pathogenic vs. saprophytic growth, or when infecting different cereal hosts or different tissues of the same host, have been studied. In addition, comparative transcriptomic analyses of F. graminearum knock-out mutants with altered virulence have provided new insights into pathogenicity-related processes. The F. graminearum transcriptomic data generated over the years are now being exploited to build a systems level understanding of the biology of this pathogen, with an ultimate aim of developing effective and sustainable disease prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.