Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28411272›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Disconnection of the Perirhinal and Postrhinal Cortices Impairs Recognition of Objects in Context But Not Contextual Fear Conditioning.

Victoria R Heimer-McGinn, Devon L Poeta, Krishan Aghi, Methma Udawatta, Rebecca D Burwell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Jamais vu all over again.Nature neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Victoria R Heimer-McGinnDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences and.ORCID 0000-0001-7292-1085
Devon L PoetaDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences and.ORCID 0000-0002-6286-7182
Krishan AghiDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences and.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-6641
Methma UdawattaDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences and.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-3959
Rebecca D BurwellDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences and rebecca_burwell@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2063-9616
Brown University · US

Funding

Circuit analysis of corticohippocampal interactions in memoryR01MH108729 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BURWELL, REBECCA D. · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Training Programs in Systems and Behavioral NeuroscienceT32MH019118 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CONNORS, BARRY W · 1989 to 2013
$1.9M
Perirhinal Contributions to Postrhinal Representations of ContextF32MH105210 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI HEIMER-MCGINN, VICTORIA R. · 2015 to 2016
$109k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH105210NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108729NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perirhinal cortex (PER) is known to process object information, whereas the rodent postrhinal cortex (POR), homolog to the parahippocampal cortex in primates, is thought to process spatial information. A number of studies, however, provide evidence that both areas are involved in processing contextual information. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the rat POR relies on object information received from the PER to form complex representations of context. Using three fear-conditioning (FC) paradigms (signaled, unsignaled, and renewal) and two context-guided object recognition tasks (with 3D and 2D objects), we examined the effects of crossed excitotoxic lesions to the POR and the contralateral PER. Performance of rats with crossed lesions was compared with that of rats with ipsilateral POR plus PER lesions and sham-operated rats. We found that rats with contralateral PER-POR lesions were impaired in object-context recognition but not in contextual FC. Therefore, interaction between the POR and PER is necessary for context-guided exploratory behavior but not for associating fear with context. Our results provide evidence for the hypothesis that the POR relies on object and pattern information from the PER to encode representations of context. The association of fear with a context, however, may be supported by alternate cortical and/or subcortical pathways when PER-POR interaction is not available. Our results suggest that contextual FC may represent a special case of context-guided behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, ClassicalCuesExtinction, PsychologicalFearMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysPattern Recognition, VisualPerirhinal CortexRatsRats, Long-Evanshippocampuslesionmedial temporal lobeparahippocampalrecognition memoryspatial

Identifiers

PMID28411272
PMCPMC5426571
OpenAlexW2606834381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.