Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28411153›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2017

Antagonism of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in medial prefrontal cortex disrupts the context preexposure facilitation effect.

P A Robinson-Drummer, N A Heroux, M E Stanton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Outcome-Locked Cholinergic Signaling Suppresses Prefrontal Encoding of Stimulus Associations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ventral Hippocampal Input to the Prelimbic Cortex Dissociates the Context from the Cue Association in Trace Fear Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P A Robinson-DrummerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States. Electronic address: probinson@psych.udel.edu.
N A HerouxDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.
M E StantonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.
University of Delaware · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Context Conditioning in the Developing RatR01HD075066 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI ROSEN, JEFFREY B, STANTON, MARK E. · 2014 to 2016
$863k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholinergic function plays a role in a variant of context fear conditioning known as the context preexposure facilitation effect (CPFE; Robinson-Drummer, Dokovna, Heroux, & Stanton, 2016). In the CPFE, acquisition of a context representation, the context-shock association, and expression of context fear occur across successive phases, usually 24h apart. Systemic administration of scopolamine, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, prior to each phase (context preexposure, immediate-shock training, and testing) disrupts the CPFE in juvenile rats (Robinson-Drummer et al., 2016). Dorsal hippocampal (dHPC) cholinergic function contributes significantly to this effect, as local infusion of scopolamine into the dHPC prior to any individual phase of the CPFE produces a disruption identical to systemic administration (Robinson-Drummer et al., 2016). The current experiment extended these findings to another forebrain region implicated in the CPFE, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Adolescent rats received bilateral infusions of scopolamine (35μg/side) or PBS 10min before all three phases of the CPFE or only prior to a single phase. Intra-mPFC administration of scopolamine prior to all three phases significantly impaired fear conditioning suggesting that mPFC cholinergic function is necessary for successful CPFE performance. Analyses of the individual infusion days revealed a significant impairment of the CPFE when infusions occurred prior to preexposure or training (i.e. immediate footshock) but not prior to testing. In total, these findings suggests a role of mPFC cholinergic function in the acquisition and/or consolidation of a contextual representation and the context-shock association but not in retrieval or expression of fear memory. Implications for mPFC involvement in contextual fear conditioning and neurological dysfunction following neonatal alcohol exposure are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, ClassicalFearFemaleFreezing Reaction, CatalepticMaleMental RecallMuscarinic AntagonistsPrefrontal CortexRats, Long-EvansReceptors, MuscarinicScopolamineMuscarinic AntagonistsReceptors, MuscarinicScopolamineCPFEFearMuscarinicPrefrontalSpatial learning

Identifiers

PMID28411153
PMCPMC5540765
OpenAlexW2606419020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.